Scanned sites / mexroofing.ca / 2026-09-13-0812

mexroofing.ca scan from 2026-09-13 08:12:21 UTC DR 7

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0812

Scanned 2026-09-13 08:12:21 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 09:38:55 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://mexroofing.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 26 pages and 208 assets of mexroofing.ca, starting from https://mexroofing.ca/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (12), meta descriptions (11), thin content (9); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.2), thin content (−3.4). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
26
Assets fetched
208
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

234 of 234 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 18 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags6 issues
    6 of 17 pages have title issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.9 points
  • Meta descriptions11 issues
    11 of 17 pages have meta description issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • Headings7 issues
    7 of 17 pages have heading issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 10 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 16 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects4 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 3 of them chained.
    −0.8 points
  • Non-200 responses5 noted
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 18 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.
    −0.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 83 image references have no alt attribute. 34 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets12 issues
    12 assets larger than 500 KB among 208 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages8 issues
    8 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage10 issues
    1 sitemap listing 21 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 6 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.9 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 21 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin content9 issues
    9 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 26 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals4 noted
    4 of 21 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives21 noted
    21 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text6 noted
    6 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 17 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length24 noted
    24 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 21 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 8 response headers recorded across 234 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 21 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 36 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2507 sites, median 80%, average 78%

mexroofing.ca scores 75%, higher than 30% of the 2507 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 73 sites74%: 73 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 89 sites77%: 101 sites78%: 113 sites79%: 99 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 113 sites83%: 113 sites84%: 117 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 79 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 53 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has some SEO issues that can be quickly addressed to improve visibility. Focus on fixing redirects, title, and meta description issues first for the best results.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down page load times and affect user experience.

    How: Redirect URLs to a single destination instead of multiple hops.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can harm your site's accessibility and SEO performance.

    How: Ensure all URLs return a 200 status by fixing or removing broken pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improper title tags confuse both search engines and users, affecting rankings.

    How: Revise the short duplicates to be unique and informative, aiming for 50-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions can lead to lower click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create concise descriptions (150-160 characters) for pages lacking them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add H1 Tags

    Why: Missing H1 tags can confuse search engines about the page's content.

    How: Add relevant H1 tags including primary keywords to each page that is missing them.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Thin Content

    Why: Thin content can hurt your SEO, as it provides little value to users.

    How: Add more information, images, or videos to the pages with fewer than 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has security gaps that may leave it vulnerable to attacks. Specifically, it lacks protections against content injection, clickjacking, and secure transport. Implementing recommended headers can significantly enhance the security posture of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users are at risk when accessing your site without HTTPS, allowing for potential interception.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lacking a CSP allows any script to run, which can lead to cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this, your pages can be embedded in a frame on other sites, leading to clickjacking risks.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This omission can lead browsers to incorrectly execute files as scripts based on content.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff'.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Third-party scripts are vulnerable to tampering, increasing the risk of malicious code execution.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that restricts script sources and consider using Subresource Integrity (SRI) where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public robots.txt file exposes paths that may require access control, providing hints for probing.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls for sensitive paths like /wp-admin/ and consider restricting its visibility.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://mexroofing.ca/iko-cambridge/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/player-embed/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/user-videos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/search-videos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/video-tag/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/video-category/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/iko-dynasty/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/test-home-123/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/home-page/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/get-a-quote/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mexroofing.ca/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 21 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://mexroofing.ca/iko-cambridge/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/player-embed/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/user-videos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/search-videos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/video-tag/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/video-category/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/iko-dynasty/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/test-home-123/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/home-page/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/get-a-quote/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mexroofing.ca/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://mexroofing.ca/iko-cambridge/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/player-embed/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/user-videos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/search-videos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/video-tag/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/video-category/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/iko-dynasty/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/test-home-123/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/home-page/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/get-a-quote/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://mexroofing.ca/iko-cambridge/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/player-embed/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/user-videos/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/search-videos/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/video-tag/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/video-category/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/iko-dynasty/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/test-home-123/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/home-page/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/get-a-quote/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mexroofing.ca/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (18 script tags)
    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (18 script tags)
    • d3ey4dbjkt2f6s.cloudfront.net (7 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 21 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near mexroofing.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling mexroofing.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own mexroofing.ca?