Scanned sites / mavnhair.com / 2026-11-01-1856

mavnhair.com scan from 2026-11-01 18:56:35 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-01-1856

Scanned 2026-11-01 18:56:35 UTC, finished 2026-11-01 19:33:37 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://mavnhair.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

68/ 100Needs work

On November 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 86 pages and 173 assets of mavnhair.com, starting from https://mavnhair.com/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 11 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (55), thin content (48), title tags (38); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), thin content (−5.3), title tags (−5.2). 12 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
86
Assets fetched
173
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

259 of 259 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 22 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags38 issues
    38 of 66 pages have title issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.2 points
  • Meta descriptions55 issues
    55 of 66 pages have meta description issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6 points
  • Headings58 issues
    58 of 66 pages have heading issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites25 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 22 destinations checked.
  • Redirects6 issues
    9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses5 issues
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 5 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability8 issues
    8 of 70 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −1.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 603 image references have no alt attribute. 23 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets6 issues
    6 assets larger than 500 KB among 173 fetched assets.
    −3.6 points
  • Orphan pages30 issues
    30 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage37 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 72 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 7 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 27 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 73 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content48 issues
    48 of 66 pages have fewer than 200 words. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format11 noted
    11 of 86 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals5 noted
    5 of 73 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives73 noted
    73 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text4 noted
    4 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure33 noted
    33 of 66 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation3 noted
    3 of 73 pages have HTML problems: 0 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    73 of 66 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (73), ListItem (73), WebSite (73), Organization (73), HairSalon (73). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 12 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 73 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions3 noted
    3 of 39 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 259 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 73 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling5 noted
    5 words an English dictionary does not know, on 4 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2531 sites, median 80%, average 78%

mavnhair.com scores 68%, higher than 14% of the 2531 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 30 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 38 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 49 sites71%: 74 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 74 sites74%: 74 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 89 sites77%: 101 sites78%: 115 sites79%: 101 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 116 sites84%: 118 sites85%: 95 sites86%: 77 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 64 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 55 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 20 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites68% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several critical issues that need addressing, including broken links, redirects, title and meta description problems, heavy assets, and indexability warnings. Prioritize fixing these areas to improve your site's performance and SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix 404 Broken Link

    Why: One internal link points to a broken URL, affecting user experience.

    How: Update the link on https://mavnhair.com/sitemap/ to point to the correct page.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Consolidate Redirects

    Why: 9 URLs are redirecting, which can slow down page loading.

    How: Identify the redirected URLs and ensure you are directly linking to their final destinations to reduce unnecessary hops.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 38 pages have title issues, which affects SEO rankings.

    How: Modify title tags for affected pages to ensure they are descriptive and within 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 55 pages have meta description issues, leading to lower click-through rates.

    How: Write concise meta descriptions that accurately summarize the content for the 55 affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Several large scripts affect load times and user experience.

    How: Shrink the heavy assets, primarily JS and CSS files listed in the findings.

    Evidence: 342 KB of script, loaded by 73 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    73 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: Some indexable pages are incorrectly marked, affecting visibility.

    How: Remove noindex tags from pages that should be indexed and update sitemap referencing.

    Checks: indexability

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several important security headers missing and is using a vulnerable JavaScript library. Adding proper headers will enhance protection against attacks while upgrading vulnerable libraries is crucial for site security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your pages could be embedded in frames on other sites, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  2. 2

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library FoundMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 2.1.0 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers might execute files as scripts incorrectly.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    No Referrer Policy SetLow

    Why it matters: Not having a Referrer-Policy could expose sensitive page URLs when users navigate away.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  5. 5

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The server banner reveals software versions, which can aid attackers in identifying vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Consider removing or obscuring the 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without a Permissions-Policy, browser features remain enabled that could be exploited by attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(none), microphone=(none), camera=(none).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 73 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://mavnhair.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/cart/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/cut-choice/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/color-services-selection/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/style-choice/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/joanne/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/kendra/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/jason/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/kyla/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/referral_program/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://mavnhair.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/cart/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/cut-choice/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/color-services-selection/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/style-choice/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/joanne/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/kendra/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/jason/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/kyla/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mavnhair.com/referral_program/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://mavnhair.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/cart/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/cut-choice/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/color-services-selection/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/style-choice/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/team/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/joanne/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/kendra/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/jason/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/kyla/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/referral_program/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://mavnhair.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/cart/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/cut-choice/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/color-services-selection/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/style-choice/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/team/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/joanne/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/kendra/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/jason/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/kyla/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://mavnhair.com/referral_program/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache (259 responses)
    • x-powered-by: PHP/8.5.12 (4 responses)
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.1.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.1.0 in https://mavnhair.com/wp-content/boost-cache/static/89ffd7bb22.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • stats.wp.com (80 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • js.stripe.com (1 script tag)
    • embed.acuityscheduling.com (12 script tags)
    • www.youtube.com (1 script tag)
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 73 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 73 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 73 pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    82 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near mavnhair.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling mavnhair.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own mavnhair.com?