Scanned sites / massagemissoula.com / 2026-09-10-1306

massagemissoula.com scan from 2026-09-10 13:06:29 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-1306

Scanned 2026-09-10 13:06:29 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 17:29:11 UTC

Site: https://massagemissoula.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 10 pages and 114 assets of massagemissoula.com, starting from https://massagemissoula.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by thin content (5), meta descriptions (4), title tags (3); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to thin content (−5), meta descriptions (−4), title tags (−3.8). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
10
Assets fetched
114
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

124 of 124 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 7 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 8 pages have title issues.
    −3.8 points
  • Meta descriptions4 issues
    4 of 8 pages have meta description issues.
    −4 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 8 pages have heading issues.
    −1.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 7 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses3 noted
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 8 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 43 image references have no alt attribute. 35 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 114 fetched assets.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1 points
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 8 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.5 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 8 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 8 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 10 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 8 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives8 noted
    8 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 8 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    2 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 8 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 124 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 8 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 58 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2318 sites, median 79%, average 78%

massagemissoula.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2318 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The website has several SEO issues to address, including redirects, title tags, meta descriptions, and thin content. Prioritize fixing these for better search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Update URLs to direct to the final destination without redirection.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing these improves accessibility and user experience.

    How: Update the affected URLs to return a 200 status code.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Optimized titles boost search rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Modify titles to be unique, descriptive, and under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing descriptions hinder organic visibility.

    How: Add unique, concise meta descriptions for each affected URL.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add H1 Headings

    Why: Missing H1s can impact content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has a unique H1 heading to describe its content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Thin Content

    Why: Thin content can lead to lower search engine ranking.

    How: Enhance content on affected pages to exceed 200 words with valuable information.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website massagemissoula.com has several significant security vulnerabilities, including missing HTTP headers that protect against man-in-the-middle attacks, clickjacking, and content type sniffing. It's crucial to implement these security measures to safeguard user data and site integrity.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors who enter the site without HTTPS may be vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the header `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains` to all responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and frames, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Implement a header like `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to restrict resource loading.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No protection against clickjacking, allowing framing by malicious sites.

    Fix: Add `X-Frame-Options: DENY` to all responses to disallow framing.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret content types, leading to security vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Include `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` in all responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Potential Risks from Third-party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity can alter site behavior if compromised.

    Fix: Consider using SRI for external scripts or enforce CSP that limits domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The presence of private paths in robots.txt exposes them to potential attackers.

    Fix: Ensure sensitive paths are controlled with proper access permissions instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://massagemissoula.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://massagemissoula.com/therapeutic-massage/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://massagemissoula.com/contacts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://massagemissoula.com/hello-world/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://massagemissoula.com/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://massagemissoula.com/category/uncategorized/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://massagemissoula.com/author/cspurlockfirstsolution-com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://massagemissoula.com/author/da_newwebdevtemplate/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 8 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://massagemissoula.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://massagemissoula.com/therapeutic-massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://massagemissoula.com/contacts/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://massagemissoula.com/hello-world/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://massagemissoula.com/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://massagemissoula.com/category/uncategorized/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://massagemissoula.com/author/cspurlockfirstsolution-com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://massagemissoula.com/author/da_newwebdevtemplate/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://massagemissoula.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/therapeutic-massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/contacts/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/hello-world/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/category/uncategorized/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/author/cspurlockfirstsolution-com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/author/da_newwebdevtemplate/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://massagemissoula.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/therapeutic-massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/contacts/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/hello-world/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/category/uncategorized/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/author/cspurlockfirstsolution-com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://massagemissoula.com/author/da_newwebdevtemplate/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (8 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 8 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near massagemissoula.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling massagemissoula.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own massagemissoula.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming massagemissoula.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.