Scanned sites / lidea-seeds.hu / 2026-10-21-0947

lidea-seeds.hu scan from 2026-10-21 09:47:22 UTC DR 19

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-21-0947

Scanned 2026-10-21 09:47:22 UTC, finished 2026-10-21 09:58:34 UTC

Site: https://lidea-seeds.hu/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On October 21, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 99 pages and 33 assets of lidea-seeds.hu, starting from https://lidea-seeds.hu/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (78), meta descriptions (47), title tags (28); 18 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−6), meta descriptions (−4.8), title tags (−3.6). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 4 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
99
Assets fetched
33
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

132 of 132 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 7 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags28 issues
    28 of 78 pages have title issues.
    −3.6 points
  • Meta descriptions47 issues
    47 of 78 pages have meta description issues.
    −4.8 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 78 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites79 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 7 destinations checked.
  • Redirects20 issues
    20 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    21 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 21 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 78 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 326 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 33 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages14 issues
    14 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage78 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 78 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 78 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content22 issues
    22 of 78 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −2.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 99 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 78 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 78 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure40 noted
    40 of 78 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 78 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    No page carries structured data (78 indexable pages checked).
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 78 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 78 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions2 noted
    2 of 64 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 132 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 78 pages; 40 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingOK
    No unfamiliar lower-case words on 78 pages (English pages only).

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2301 sites, median 79%, average 78%

lidea-seeds.hu scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2301 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 43 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 67 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 105 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 107 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 96 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 84 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 45 sites92%: 36 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several areas for improvement, primarily with broken links, redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions. Addressing these will enhance user experience and potentially improve rankings.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 1 broken link may lead to poor user experience.

    How: Update or remove the link to the broken URL (https://lidea-seeds.hu/products/tropical-dent).

    Evidence: https://lidea-seeds.hu/products/tropical-dent answers 404, and one page links to it with anchor text such as "TROPICAL DENT®".

    1 page affected

    Depends on: If the destination was deleted on purpose, remove the links rather than redirecting to an unrelated page.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Clean Up Redirects

    Why: 20 redirected URLs and 1 chained redirect slow down your site.

    How: Implement direct links instead of redirects when possible, especially for the chained redirect.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 47 pages with meta description issues can impact SEO.

    How: Create concise meta descriptions for affected pages, focusing on primary keywords.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 28 pages have title issues, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to be within 50-60 characters for optimal length.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: 2 pages flagged may affect visibility in search results.

    How: Add canonical tags to these pages to clarify their importance.

    Evidence: 2 pages flagged: No canonical.

    2 pages affected

    Depends on: Confirm the pages really share a cause before changing them together.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 1 sitemap listing 0 URLs could hinder crawling and indexing.

    How: Ensure all 78 relevant pages are included in the sitemap.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security shortcomings that put user data at risk, including missing security headers and software version disclosure. Implementing the recommended fixes will improve the site's security posture and protect user information.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 4 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, attackers can intercept requests from users who type the site address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without CSP, there are no restrictions on where scripts and resources can load from, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add a basic CSP header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of clickjacking protection allows pages to be framed, increasing the risk of user data theft.

    Fix: Add the header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing Protection (X-Content-Type-Options)Low

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret file types, leading to potential security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: A missing referrer policy exposes full URLs of pages visited by users to external sites.

    Fix: Add the header: `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer`.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exposing server and framework version information increases the risk of targeted attacks.

    Fix: Hide software version by configuring the server to not reveal these details (e.g., `server_tokens off;` in Nginx).

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running third-party scripts without SRI increases the risk of script compromise.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy to control third-party domains or use Subresource Integrity.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without a permissions policy, the site may unintentionally expose sensitive browser features to scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: `Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()`.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 78 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu) (132 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Next.js (79 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • lideaseedsfr.matomo.cloud (40 script tags)
6 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 78 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near lidea-seeds.hu

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lidea-seeds.hu from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lidea-seeds.hu?