Scanned sites / lhmglaw.com

SEO report for lhmglaw.com DR 12

The latest Site Spider scan of lhmglaw.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/lhmglaw-com/2026-09-10-0722.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 07:22:36 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 11:06:40 UTC

Site: https://lhmglaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 193 pages and 306 assets of lhmglaw.com, starting from https://lhmglaw.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (110), title tags (58), links to other sites (11); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−5.9), title tags (−3.9), links to other sites (−2.9). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
193
Assets fetched
306
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

499 of 499 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 99 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 141 pages have title issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.9 points
  • Meta descriptions110 issues
    110 of 141 pages have meta description issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.9 points
  • Headings36 issues
    36 of 141 pages have heading issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites11 issues
    11 destinations answered with an error, 59 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 99 destinations checked.
    −2.9 points
  • Redirects45 issues
    46 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −1.2 points
  • Non-200 responses46 noted
    46 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 45 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability5 issues
    5 of 147 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 6 image references have no alt attribute. 4 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 306 fetched assets.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pages41 issues
    41 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage55 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 129 URLs: 13 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 41 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.2 points
  • Internal link counts44 noted
    Internal link counts for 148 pages; 44 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 141 pages have fewer than 200 words. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format11 noted
    11 of 193 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals7 noted
    7 of 148 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives148 noted
    148 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure99 noted
    99 of 141 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length5 noted
    5 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies44 noted
    44 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 148 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 499 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 148 pages; 108 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2318 sites, median 79%, average 78%

lhmglaw.com scores 79%, higher than 47% of the 2318 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

To enhance SEO for lhmglaw.com, address redirect issues, fix non-200 responses, optimize title tags and meta descriptions, and resolve heading problems. These changes will improve search visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 46 redirecting URLs can confuse crawlers and degrade user experience.

    How: Update or remove unnecessary redirects, especially the chained one. Ensure direct access to final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 46 URLs returning non-200 responses can lead to poor indexing.

    How: Identify and fix the underlying issues (update links, resolve server errors) for all affected URLs.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 54 pages with title issues can negatively impact click-through rates.

    How: Shorten title tags to less than 60 characters and ensure uniqueness across pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Meta Descriptions

    Why: 46 pages with meta description issues can affect search engine visibility.

    How: Craft unique meta descriptions under 160 characters that accurately describe the page content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: 36 pages with heading issues can lead to poor content structure.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 tag and properly structured subheadings (H2, H3) for clarity.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 13 crawled pages missing from the sitemap may hinder discovery.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all relevant URLs and fix listed issues, like broken URLs.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lhmglaw.com lacks critical security headers like Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which increases risk for clickjacking and content-type vulnerabilities. Additionally, third-party scripts are included without integrity checks, and sensitive paths are exposed in the robots.txt file. Immediate action is recommended to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: No restrictions on where scripts, styles, and frames may load from increases risk of script injection attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header with a suitable value, e.g., `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks by allowing its pages to be framed.

    Fix: Add an X-Frame-Options header with value `DENY` or `SAMEORIGIN`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might execute files based on their content rather than their declared type, leading to execution of malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add an X-Content-Type-Options header with the value `nosniff`.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains could be compromised, changing site behavior or injecting malicious content.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) for all external scripts, or use a Content Security Policy that restricts trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Path Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Exposing sensitive paths to the public can guide attackers in probing the site for vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls are in place for sensitive paths mentioned in the robots.txt file.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 148 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lhmglaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/lawyer-luebeck-mark/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/lawyer-hammar-timothy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/ryan-d-mccarty/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/eric-goldwarg/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/madison-cisiewski/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/personal-injury-attorneys/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/criminal-defense-attorneys/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/dui-defense-attorneys/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lhmglaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/lawyer-luebeck-mark/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/lawyer-hammar-timothy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/ryan-d-mccarty/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/eric-goldwarg/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/madison-cisiewski/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/personal-injury-attorneys/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/criminal-defense-attorneys/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/dui-defense-attorneys/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lhmglaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/lawyer-luebeck-mark/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/lawyer-hammar-timothy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/ryan-d-mccarty/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/eric-goldwarg/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/bozeman-attorneys/madison-cisiewski/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/personal-injury-attorneys/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/criminal-defense-attorneys/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lhmglaw.com/practice-areas/dui-defense-attorneys/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • kit.fontawesome.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (13 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 148 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 148 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    13 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of lhmglaw.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near lhmglaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lhmglaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lhmglaw.com?