Scanned sites / lethbridgephysiotherapy.com / 2026-09-11-2111

lethbridgephysiotherapy.com scan from 2026-09-11 21:11:49 UTC DR 2

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-2111

Scanned 2026-09-11 21:11:49 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 21:15:18 UTC

Site: https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 26 pages and 33 assets of lethbridgephysiotherapy.com, starting from https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by thin content (23), meta descriptions (13), sitemap coverage (6); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to thin content (−7.4), meta descriptions (−4.2), sitemap coverage (−1.4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
26
Assets fetched
33
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

59 of 61 discovered URLs were fetched, 2 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 9 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 23 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Meta descriptions13 issues
    13 of 23 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 23 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.8 points
  • Links to other sites7 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 9 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 23 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 55 image references have no alt attribute. 55 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 33 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages6 issues
    6 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 23 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 6 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.4 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 25 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content23 issues
    23 of 23 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 26 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 25 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives25 noted
    25 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure15 noted
    15 of 23 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 25 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 59 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 25 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 73 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

lethbridgephysiotherapy.com scores 84%, higher than 65% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks several important security headers that protect against various types of attacks, such as content injection and clickjacking. Implementing these protections is crucial to safeguarding user data and privacy.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    No HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to all responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP increases vulnerability to cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Include 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' in all responses.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows framing from other sites, risking clickjacking.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' in all responses to prevent this attack.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers may incorrectly interpret file types.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in all responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Potentially private paths could be exploited since robots.txt is publicly accessible.

    Fix: Remove or restrict sensitive paths from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/accupuncture/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/physiotherapy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/massage-therapy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/acupuncture/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/ims-needling/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/kinesiology/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/rehabilitation-programs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/more/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/access-intake-forms/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/e-payment/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 25 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/accupuncture/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/physiotherapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/massage-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/acupuncture/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/ims-needling/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/kinesiology/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/rehabilitation-programs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/more/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/access-intake-forms/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/e-payment/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/accupuncture/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/physiotherapy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/massage-therapy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/acupuncture/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/ims-needling/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/kinesiology/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/rehabilitation-programs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/more/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/access-intake-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/e-payment/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/accupuncture/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/physiotherapy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/massage-therapy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/acupuncture/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/ims-needling/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/kinesiology/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/rehabilitation-programs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/more/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/access-intake-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgephysiotherapy.com/e-payment/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 6 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /includes/
    • Disallow: /config/
    • Disallow: /backup/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 25 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    8 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near lethbridgephysiotherapy.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lethbridgephysiotherapy.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lethbridgephysiotherapy.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lethbridgephysiotherapy.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.