Scanned sites / lethbridgepet.ca / 2026-09-10-0942

lethbridgepet.ca scan from 2026-09-10 09:42:29 UTC DR 6

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-0942

Scanned 2026-09-10 09:42:29 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 15:23:01 UTC

Site: https://lethbridgepet.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 52 pages and 257 assets of lethbridgepet.ca, starting from https://lethbridgepet.ca/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (43), heavy assets (27), title tags (11); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.5), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−2.4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
52
Assets fetched
257
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

309 of 312 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 29 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags11 issues
    11 of 45 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Meta descriptions43 issues
    43 of 45 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −7.5 points
  • Headings11 issues
    11 of 45 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites106 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 7 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
  • Redirects6 issues
    7 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses8 noted
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 6 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 46 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 265 image references have no alt attribute. 122 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets27 issues
    27 assets larger than 500 KB among 257 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 43 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 46 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 45 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 52 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 46 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives46 noted
    46 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text10 noted
    10 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure8 noted
    8 of 45 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length50 noted
    50 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 46 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 309 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 46 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 48 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2318 sites, median 79%, average 78%

lethbridgepet.ca scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2318 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several issues that could impact SEO performance. The most critical are fixing redirects, non-200 responses, and addressing title, meta description, and heading problems.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can affect user experience and SEO. Clean them up.

    How: Update the URLs to point directly to the final destinations without redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: These URLs should return a 200 status for proper indexing.

    How: Check the listed URLs and ensure they return a 200 response or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tags

    Why: Optimized title tags improve click-through rates and visibility.

    How: Shorten titles to 60 characters or less, ensuring they describe the page accurately.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions help improve organic click-through rates.

    How: Add concise and relevant meta descriptions to pages missing them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Proper headings improve content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 and review pages with multiple H1s.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has multiple security header omissions that could expose it to risks such as interception of initial requests, clickjacking, script vulnerabilities, and MIME type confusion. Urgent action is needed to address these issues.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted on their first request if they access using HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of resources, increasing the risk of malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header or a CSP frame-ancestors directive exposes the site to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this, browsers may mistakenly interpret files as scripts based on content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can introduce vulnerabilities if these domains are compromised.

    Fix: Consider using Subresource Integrity for critical scripts or implement a strong Content-Security-Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/urgent-care/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/preventative-care/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/diagnostics/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/dental/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/surgery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/medical/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/follow-up-care/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/grooming/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/referrals/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 46 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/urgent-care/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/preventative-care/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/diagnostics/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/dental/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/surgery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/medical/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/follow-up-care/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/grooming/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/referrals/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/urgent-care/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/preventative-care/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/diagnostics/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/dental/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/surgery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/medical/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/follow-up-care/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/grooming/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/referrals/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/urgent-care/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/preventative-care/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/diagnostics/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/dental/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/surgery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/medical/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/follow-up-care/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/grooming/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lethbridgepet.ca/services/referrals/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 6 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn-cookieyes.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
    • pagead2.googlesyndication.com (40 script tags)
    • accounts.google.com (40 script tags)
    • stats.wp.com (40 script tags)
    • img1.wsimg.com (40 script tags)
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 46 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near lethbridgepet.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lethbridgepet.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lethbridgepet.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lethbridgepet.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.