Scanned sites / legacytatt.com / 2026-09-12-0837

legacytatt.com scan from 2026-09-12 08:37:34 UTC DR 4

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0837

Scanned 2026-09-12 08:37:34 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 13:29:10 UTC

Site: https://legacytatt.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 83 pages and 943 assets of legacytatt.com, starting from https://legacytatt.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by image alt text (69), heavy assets (7), meta descriptions (12); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to image alt text (−5.2), heavy assets (−4.2), meta descriptions (−1.4). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
83
Assets fetched
943
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,026 of 1,028 discovered URLs were fetched, 2 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 18 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags6 issues
    6 of 42 pages have title issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.9 points
  • Meta descriptions12 issues
    12 of 42 pages have meta description issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.4 points
  • Headings7 issues
    7 of 42 pages have heading issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 18 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects12 issues
    15 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.7 points
  • Non-200 responses26 noted
    26 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 14 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability10 issues
    10 of 51 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 18 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −1.4 points
  • Image alt text69 issues
    69 of 80 image references have no alt attribute.
    −5.2 points
  • Heavy assets7 issues
    7 assets larger than 500 KB among 943 fetched assets.
    −4.2 points
  • Orphan pages17 issues
    17 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1 points
  • Sitemap coverage12 issues
    8 sitemaps listing 46 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 2 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 8 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link counts26 noted
    Internal link counts for 69 pages; 26 worth a look.
  • Thin content4 issues
    4 of 42 pages have fewer than 200 words. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format22 noted
    22 of 83 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals25 noted
    25 of 69 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives69 noted
    69 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure5 noted
    5 of 42 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    2 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies9 noted
    9 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 69 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 1026 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 69 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 51 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2347 sites, median 79%, average 78%

legacytatt.com scores 83%, higher than 64% of the 2347 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 103 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 89 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has good health but needs attention on redirects, status codes, and several content elements. Focus on these improvements for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing 26 non-200 responses improves user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the listed URLs to return a 200 status code.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Address Redirects

    Why: 15 redirects can dilute link equity. Reducing them helps SEO.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects by updating links to point directly to final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Improving 6 title tag issues enhances keyword relevance and click-through rates.

    How: Update each title to be descriptive and between 30-60 characters long.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Fixing 9 missing or short meta descriptions increases visibility and engagement.

    How: Add concise and relevant meta descriptions of 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: 7 pages missing H1s can hinder content structure and SEO.

    How: Include a relevant H1 heading on affected pages.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Add Image Alt Text

    Why: 69 images without alt text is detrimental for accessibility and SEO.

    How: Add descriptive alt attributes to all images for better context.

    Checks: images-alt

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website legacytatt.com has several security issues that could expose visitors to risks. Key concerns include a lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), inadequate Clickjacking protection, and an exposed Google API key. Immediate actions are recommended to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be vulnerable to interception on initial connections.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains'

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your pages can be embedded by other sites, compromising user security.

    Fix: Set the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or use a CSP with frame-ancestors.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An unprotected API key can be abused by unauthorized users, leading to potential service interruptions and costs.

    Fix: Restrict the API key by HTTP referrer in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Scripts loaded from other domains can introduce vulnerabilities if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for supported scripts, or use a Content-Security-Policy to specify trusted domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public nature of robots.txt exposes sensitive paths which can be accessed without restrictions.

    Fix: Consider implementing proper access controls instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://legacytatt.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/about-legacy-tattoo/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/our-artists/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/senior-tattoo-artists/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/cedrick-black-and-grey-realism-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/jesse-illustrative-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/mar-microrealism-and-fineline-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/rachel-fineline-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/roman-realism-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/ryan-black-and-grey-realism/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/sabrina-pet-and-floral-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/yeva-minimalism-and-fineline-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 69 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://legacytatt.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/about-legacy-tattoo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/our-artists/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/senior-tattoo-artists/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/cedrick-black-and-grey-realism-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/jesse-illustrative-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/mar-microrealism-and-fineline-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/rachel-fineline-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/roman-realism-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/ryan-black-and-grey-realism/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/sabrina-pet-and-floral-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://legacytatt.com/cmsms_profile/yeva-minimalism-and-fineline-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…ao (39 chars) in https://legacytatt.com/contact/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • accounts.google.com (39 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (39 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 69 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 69 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 69 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    149 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near legacytatt.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling legacytatt.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own legacytatt.com?