Scanned sites / lecoeurdufoyer.com

SEO report for lecoeurdufoyer.com DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of lecoeurdufoyer.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/lecoeurdufoyer-com/2026-09-24-0539.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-24 05:39:56 UTC, finished 2026-09-24 05:57:39 UTC

Site: https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 24, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 129 pages and 465 assets of lecoeurdufoyer.com, starting from https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (11), meta descriptions (60), title tags (26); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5), title tags (−2.7). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
129
Assets fetched
465
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

594 of 594 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 3 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags26 issues
    26 of 60 pages have title issues. 36 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions60 issues
    60 of 60 pages have meta description issues. 36 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 60 pages have heading issues. 36 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites96 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 3 destinations checked.
  • Redirects32 issues
    34 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.3 points
  • Non-200 responses34 noted
    34 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 33 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 84 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 12 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 600 image references have no alt attribute. 192 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets11 issues
    11 assets larger than 500 KB among 465 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage35 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 33 URLs: 31 crawled pages missing, 2 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.2 points
  • Internal link counts25 noted
    Internal link counts for 96 pages; 25 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 60 pages have fewer than 200 words. 36 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format30 noted
    30 of 129 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals32 noted
    32 of 96 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives96 noted
    96 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text54 noted
    54 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure8 noted
    8 of 60 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 36 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length24 noted
    24 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookies3 noted
    3 cookies set by the site, 3 missing a protective flag; 15 response headers recorded across 594 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 96 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 69 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2893 sites, median 80%, average 79%

lecoeurdufoyer.com scores 83%, higher than 61% of the 2893 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0761520%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 54 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 77 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 113 sites80%: 129 sites81%: 123 sites82%: 134 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 82 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 57 sites91%: 60 sites92%: 44 sites93%: 31 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 16 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 152 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Action is needed to resolve title and meta description issues, improve redirects, and address sitemap entries. Implementing these fixes will enhance your site's SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tags

    Why: 26 pages need improved title tags for better SEO.

    How: Update titles to be unique and within 30-60 characters. For example, change 'About Us' to 'About Us | Quality Care at Le Cœur du Foyer'.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Fix Meta Descriptions

    Why: 60 pages are missing or too long for meta descriptions, harming search visibility.

    How: Create unique, concise meta descriptions (under 160 characters) for each page to encourage clicks.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 34 URLs are redirecting unnecessarily, leading to poor user experience.

    How: Identify and correct the redirect chains to point to the final destination directly.

    Checks: redirects

  4. 4

    Address Sitemap Coverage Issues

    Why: Sitemaps contain broken redirects or noindex URLs, leading to SEO inefficiencies.

    How: Remove the broken or noindex URLs from the sitemap and ensure all relevant pages are included.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: 11 large assets can slow down your site performance.

    How: Compress images to reduce their sizes using tools like TinyPNG or ImageOptim.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Handle Non-200 Responses

    Why: 34 URLs returning non-200 responses can lead to indexing issues.

    How: Fix or remove any pages returning 3xx or 404 status codes.

    Checks: status-codes

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lecoeurdufoyer.com has several security concerns, including missing headers that protect against clickjacking and sniffing attacks. It also does not implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), risking interception of user traffic. Addressing these issues will enhance the site's security significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users accessing via HTTP can be intercepted during the first request.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Pages could be embedded in malicious frames, exposing users to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Include 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or use a CSP directive to mitigate this risk.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing Cookie FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies lack protections, making them vulnerable to theft or misuse.

    Fix: Set cookies with 'HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict' attributes.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute misclassified files as scripts.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: The full URL can be sent to other sites, potentially leaking sensitive information.

    Fix: Include 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' to limit information exposure.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server information allows attackers to exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or obfuscate 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without this, browser features remain enabled, which could be exploited by scripts.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self)' to limit access to unused features.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/support-and-reassuring-presence/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/in-home-support-service/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/personalized-mobility-and-assistance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/our-clients/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/downloads/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    4 of 96 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/support-and-reassuring-presence/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/in-home-support-service/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/personalized-mobility-and-assistance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/our-clients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/faq/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/downloads/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/support-and-reassuring-presence/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/in-home-support-service/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/personalized-mobility-and-assistance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/our-clients/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/downloads/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/support-and-reassuring-presence/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/in-home-support-service/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/personalized-mobility-and-assistance/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/about-us/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/our-clients/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/careers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/blog/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/faq/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/downloads/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/support-and-reassuring-presence/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/in-home-support-service/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/services/personalized-mobility-and-assistance/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/about-us/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/our-clients/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/careers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/blog/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/faq/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/downloads/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: LiteSpeed (594 responses)
    • x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33 (136 responses)
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    3 of 3 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • woocommerce_items_in_cart (set by https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/shop/?add-to-cart=434) lacks HttpOnly, SameSite
    • woocommerce_cart_hash (set by https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/shop/?add-to-cart=434) lacks HttpOnly, SameSite
    • wp_woocommerce_session_853ca847b5c1943e0b7160768148a19b (set by https://lecoeurdufoyer.com/fr/shop/?add-to-cart=434) lacks SameSite
9 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 96 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 4 of 96 pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    49 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of lecoeurdufoyer.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near lecoeurdufoyer.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lecoeurdufoyer.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lecoeurdufoyer.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lecoeurdufoyer.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.