Scanned sites / lcwindustries.ca

SEO report for lcwindustries.ca DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of lcwindustries.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/lcwindustries-ca/2026-09-14-0237.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 02:37:26 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 03:20:29 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://lcwindustries.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 153 pages and 1000 assets of lcwindustries.ca, starting from https://lcwindustries.ca/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (67), heavy assets (136), meta descriptions (65); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.1), heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.8). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
153
Assets fetched
1000
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,153 of 1,154 discovered URLs were fetched, 22 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 12 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags67 issues
    67 of 105 pages have title issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • Meta descriptions65 issues
    65 of 105 pages have meta description issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Headings36 issues
    36 of 105 pages have heading issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites329 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 5 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.
  • Redirects43 issues
    44 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.6 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    45 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 109 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1296 image references have no alt attribute. 7 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets136 issues
    136 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages20 issues
    20 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage30 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 96 URLs: 10 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 20 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.7 points
  • Internal link counts30 noted
    Internal link counts for 109 pages; 30 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 105 pages have fewer than 200 words. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format4 noted
    4 of 153 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals4 noted
    4 of 109 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives109 noted
    109 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text47 noted
    47 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure26 noted
    26 of 105 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length165 noted
    165 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 109 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 1153 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 109 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 61 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

lcwindustries.ca scores 77%, higher than 35% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

There are significant SEO improvements needed on your site, particularly in addressing broken links, redirects, and issues with titles and meta descriptions. Address these priorities to enhance your site's performance and visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hurt user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the broken link from https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-services/ to https://lcwindustries.ca/trees-shrubs-flower/.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Redirects

    Why: Too many redirects can slow down the site.

    How: Check and minimize 44 redirects. Consider updating internal links to point directly to the final destination URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages that don’t return a proper response can affect SEO.

    How: Review the 45 URLs with non-200 status responses and ensure they are reachable or properly redirecting.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Many titles exceed recommended length, hurting SEO.

    How: Rewrite the 67 pages with title issues to be under 60 characters, ensuring they are unique and relevant.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions impact click-through rates and SEO.

    How: Complete the 61 pages lacking meta descriptions and shorten long descriptions to under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Standardize Headings

    Why: Multiple H1s can confuse search engines and disrupt content hierarchy.

    How: Change the headings on 36 affected pages to ensure only one H1 per page.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks several essential security headers which can expose it to threats like script injection and clickjacking. Implementing basic protections like HSTS and a Content Security Policy is crucial to enhance site security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on their first request if they type the address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the browser has no restrictions on script and frame sources, increasing the risk of malicious content.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google.com https://cdn.trustindex.io;

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, pages can be embedded in other sites which may lead to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: The absence of this header allows browsers to incorrectly interpret files based on their content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from 3 external domains pose a risk if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Consider adding Subresource Integrity or a restrictive CSP for third-party scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://lcwindustries.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/quote/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-construction/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-design/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/lawn-maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/patios-walkways-service/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/lawn-and-irrigation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/rock-features/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/fencing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/tree-planting-services/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 109 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lcwindustries.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/quote/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-construction/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-design/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-maintenance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/lawn-maintenance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/patios-walkways-service/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/lawn-and-irrigation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/rock-features/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/fencing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/tree-planting-services/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lcwindustries.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/quote/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-construction/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-design/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/lawn-maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/patios-walkways-service/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/lawn-and-irrigation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/rock-features/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/fencing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/tree-planting-services/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lcwindustries.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/quote/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-construction/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-design/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/landscape-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/lawn-maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/patios-walkways-service/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/lawn-and-irrigation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/rock-features/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/fencing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lcwindustries.ca/tree-planting-services/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (3 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (40 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 109 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    5 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of lcwindustries.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near lcwindustries.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lcwindustries.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lcwindustries.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lcwindustries.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.