Scanned sites / lanehaven.com
SEO report for lanehaven.com DR 6
The latest Site Spider scan of lanehaven.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/lanehaven-com/2026-09-21-0900.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Latest scan
Scanned 2026-09-21 09:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-21 09:01:59 UTC. Found on page 1 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results
Site: https://lanehaven.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 21, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 11 pages and 137 assets of lanehaven.com, starting from https://lanehaven.com/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (9), heavy assets (22), thin content (4); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.5), heavy assets (−6), thin content (−2.9). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 11
- Assets fetched
- 137
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 8 of 27
148 of 159 discovered URLs were fetched, 11 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 2 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags2 issues2 of 10 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−1.8 points
- Meta descriptions9 issues9 of 10 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−6.5 points
- Headings5 issues5 of 10 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−2.7 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites10 noted0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 2 destinations checked.
- RedirectsOK0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses2 noted2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability1 issue1 of 10 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.−0.9 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 6 image references have no alt attribute. 6 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets22 issues22 assets larger than 500 KB among 137 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pages2 issues2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.7 points
- Sitemap coverage3 issues3 sitemaps listing 10 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.6 points
- Internal link counts1 notedInternal link counts for 11 pages; 1 worth a look.
- Thin content4 issues4 of 10 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−2.9 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 11 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- Canonicals1 noted1 of 11 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives11 noted11 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text1 noted1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structureOK0 of 10 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
- Image weight and alt length6 noted6 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 11 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 148 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 11 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 46 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this site sits among all scanned sites
2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%
lanehaven.com scores 77%, higher than 35% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
Your site has a health score of 84/100 and needs attention on title tags, headings, and some non-200 responses. The suggested improvements will enhance usability and SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Non-200 Responses
Why: 404 errors degrade user experience and crawl efficiency.
How: Remove or redirect the 404 URLs: https://lanehaven.com/about-us/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7 and https://lanehaven.com/careers/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7.
Checks: status-codes
- 2
Optimize Title Tags
Why: Short and long title tags can confuse users and search engines.
How: Update https://lanehaven.com/ to be longer than 30 characters, and reduce https://lanehaven.com/jobs/2027-crop-scout-farm-operations-intern/ below 60 characters.
Checks: titles
- 3
Correct Heading Issues
Why: Improper heading structure affects accessibility and SEO.
How: Limit H1 tags to one per page. Correct https://lanehaven.com/about-us/, https://lanehaven.com/jobs/operations-specialist/, and ensure https://lanehaven.com/contact-us/ and https://lanehaven.com/landowners/ have an H1.
Checks: headings
- 4
Reduce Heavy Assets
Why: Large assets can slow down page load times and affect user experience.
How: Compress and optimize the 22 heavy files (>500 KB) to improve loading speed.
Checks: heavy-assets
- 5
Link Orphan Pages
Why: Internal links help search engines discover all content and improve site navigation.
How: Add internal links to https://lanehaven.com/hub/ and https://lanehaven.com/jobs/basic-application/ from relevant pages.
Checks: orphan-pages
- 6
Enhance Thin Content
Why: Pages with too few words may not provide enough value to users or search engines.
How: Expand content on the 4 affected pages to ensure each has over 200 words.
Checks: thin-content
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website lanehaven.com is missing several essential security headers. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options, which expose users to risks like man-in-the-middle attacks and clickjacking. Additionally, the server version is disclosed, increasing the risk of targeted attacks.
- 0 high
- 3 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted during initial HTTP requests.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows unrestricted loading of potentially malicious scripts.
Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium
Why it matters: Without this header, the site can be embedded in frames for clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Server Version DisclosureLow
Why it matters: Revealing the server version exposes it to targeted attacks that exploit known vulnerabilities.
Fix: Configure the web server to not disclose version information.
Evidence: Software version disclosure
- 5
Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Compromise of third-party scripts can introduce vulnerabilities to your site.
Fix: Consider implementing SRI for scripts or using a CSP that includes these domains.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 6
Missing Permissions PolicyInfo
Why it matters: This feature limits browser capabilities and can help mitigate risks from injected scripts.
Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=(), camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=().
Evidence: Permissions policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://lanehaven.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/landowners/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/our-products/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/2027-crop-scout-farm-operations-intern/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/ag-diesel-farm-mechanic/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/operations-specialist/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/hub/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/basic-application/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 11 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://lanehaven.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/landowners/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/our-products/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/2027-crop-scout-farm-operations-intern/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/ag-diesel-farm-mechanic/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/operations-specialist/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/hub/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/basic-application/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://lanehaven.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/landowners/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/our-products/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/2027-crop-scout-farm-operations-intern/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/ag-diesel-farm-mechanic/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/operations-specialist/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/hub/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/basic-application/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://lanehaven.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/about-us/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/landowners/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/our-products/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/careers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/contact-us/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/2027-crop-scout-farm-operations-intern/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/ag-diesel-farm-mechanic/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/operations-specialist/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/hub/ → no permissions-policy
- https://lanehaven.com/jobs/basic-application/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundSoftware version disclosureLow
Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.
- server: Flywheel/5.1.0 (148 responses)
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (10 script tags)
- www.google.com (1 script tag)
- wpmudev.com (2 script tags)
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 11 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 11 HTML pages.
- OKReferrer policy
referrer-policy is set on all 11 HTML pages.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
6 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableCookie flags
The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Earlier scans of lanehaven.com
No other scans of this site yet.
Sites scoring near lanehaven.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- bourgeoismeatmarket.comDR 1577/100 · rank 1751 · 318 pages
- centralorthodontics.caDR 577/100 · rank 1751 · 83 pages
- bluebarn.comDR 077/100 · rank 1751 · 6 pages
- touchdownrv.comDR 1077/100 · rank 1751 · 234 pages
- www.beelows.comDR 1577/100 · rank 1751 · 19 pages
- www.atlantaharvest.comDR 3177/100 · rank 1751 · 37 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lanehaven.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own lanehaven.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lanehaven.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.