Scanned sites / kerbrank.co.uk / 2026-11-07-1059
kerbrank.co.uk scan from 2026-11-07 10:59:44 UTC DR 13
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-11-07-1059
Scanned 2026-11-07 10:59:44 UTC, finished 2026-11-07 11:01:13 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory
Site: https://kerbrank.co.uk/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On November 7, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 65 pages and 170 assets of kerbrank.co.uk, starting from https://kerbrank.co.uk/. It scored 94 out of 100, an excellent result. 4 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by links to other sites (46), meta descriptions (16), sitemap coverage (1); 19 checks passed. Most of the points went to links to other sites (−4), meta descriptions (−2), sitemap coverage (−0.1). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium1 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 65
- Assets fetched
- 170
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 4 of 33
235 of 235 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 141 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tagsOK0 of 58 pages have title issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Meta descriptions16 issues16 of 58 pages have meta description issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−2 points
- HeadingsOK0 of 58 pages have heading issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites46 issues46 destinations answered with an error, 67 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 141 destinations checked.−4 points
- RedirectsOK0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses1 noted1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- IndexabilityOK0 of 62 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
- Image alt textOK0 of 276 image references have no alt attribute.
- Heavy assetsOK0 assets larger than 500 KB among 170 fetched assets.
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage1 issue1 sitemap listing 57 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.−0.1 points
- Internal link counts4 notedInternal link counts for 65 pages; 4 worth a look.
- Thin content1 issue1 of 58 pages have fewer than 200 words. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.1 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format5 noted5 of 65 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals6 noted6 of 65 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives5 noted5 pages carry a robots directive; 60 carry none.
- Anchor textOKEvery internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
- Title and heading structure18 noted18 of 58 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length41 noted4 images over 100 KB; 37 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationOKAll 65 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured data1 noted59 of 58 indexable pages carry structured data: ListItem (57), BreadcrumbList (57), Organization (50), FAQPage (39), Question (39). 1 page with errors a rich result would fail on.
- Near duplicatesOKNo near duplicates among 58 pages with enough text to compare.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 65 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positions1 noted1 of 58 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- PaginationOKNo page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 235 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 65 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- Spelling25 noted25 words an English dictionary does not know, on 50 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2875 sites, median 80%, average 79%
kerbrank.co.uk scores 94%, higher than 92% of the 2875 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site's health score is excellent with minimal issues. Focus on improving meta descriptions, updating the sitemap, and enhancing thin content for better SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Meta Descriptions
Why: Improve click-through rates by enhancing visibility in search results.
How: Revise meta descriptions to be within 155 characters and ensure they accurately describe the content.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 2
Update Sitemap
Why: Ensure all crawled pages are indexed by search engines.
How: Add the missing URL (https://kerbrank.co.uk/login) to your sitemap.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
- 3
Enhance Thin Content
Why: Improve engagement and SEO by increasing content quantity.
How: Expand the content on the login page to at least 200 words for better user experience.
Checks: thin-content
- 4
Fix Non-200 Response
Why: Ensure all site resources are accessible to users and search engines.
How: Remove or correct the 404 error for the URL: https://kerbrank.co.uk/css/%23n.
Checks: status-codes
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website has some security vulnerabilities that need addressing. The server version is publicly disclosed, which could aid an attacker. Additionally, the Content Security Policy allows unsafe scripts, increasing the risk of injection attacks. Lastly, third-party scripts lack Subresource Integrity, which could lead to compromised content execution.
- 0 high
- 1 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Weak Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Allowing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' diminishes the effectiveness of the CSP against script injections.
Fix: Update your CSP to remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' from the 'script-src' directive.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 2
Server Version DisclosureLow
Why it matters: Exposing the server version may enable attackers to find and exploit potential vulnerabilities.
Fix: Configure your server to hide the version details, such as using 'Server: [YourServerName]' without version information.
Evidence: Software version disclosure
- 3
Lack of Subresource Integrity for Third-Party ScriptsLow
Why it matters: Without Subresource Integrity, the site is vulnerable to attacks if the third-party script is compromised.
Fix: Use Subresource Integrity (SRI) attributes for scripts from external domains, ensuring they are only loaded if they match the specified integrity.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
What the checks found
- FoundSoftware version disclosureLow
Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.
- server: Fly/366e4bf88 (2026-10-27) (235 responses)
- NoteContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/ → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/report → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/methodology → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/for-agencies → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/free-rank-check → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/tools/google-review-link → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/tools/place-id-finder → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/compare/brightlocal → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/guides → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/guides/getting-started → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/blog → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- https://kerbrank.co.uk/contact → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://analytics.ahrefs.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.postcodes.io https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://us.i.posthog.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- analytics.ahrefs.com (38 script tags)
11 checks passed, 2 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 65 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 65 HTML pages.
- OKClickjacking protection
x-frame-options is set on all 65 HTML pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 65 HTML pages.
- OKReferrer policy
referrer-policy is set on all 65 HTML pages.
- OKPermissions policy
permissions-policy is set on all 65 HTML pages.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
11 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableCookie flags
The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.
- Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries
No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near kerbrank.co.uk
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- mcglassonfarms.comDR 1395/100 · rank 196 · 12 pages
- colzelectric.comDR 1495/100 · rank 196 · 40 pages
- sublimeelectricid.netDR 1095/100 · rank 196 · 289 pages
- www.shawnessysmiles.caDR 094/100 · rank 211 · 30 pages
- heideveterinary.comDR 194/100 · rank 211 · 2,073 pages
- seonix.aiDR 894/100 · rank 211 · 189 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling kerbrank.co.uk from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own kerbrank.co.uk?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming kerbrank.co.uk. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.