Scanned sites / isupplementreviews.com / 2026-10-26-1206

isupplementreviews.com scan from 2026-10-26 12:06:10 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-26-1206

Scanned 2026-10-26 12:06:10 UTC, finished 2026-10-26 12:08:22 UTC

Site: https://isupplementreviews.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

96/ 100Excellent

On October 26, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 141 pages and 186 assets of isupplementreviews.com, starting from https://isupplementreviews.com/. It scored 96 out of 100, an excellent result. 3 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (39), title tags (28), links to other sites (1); 22 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−2.2), title tags (−2), links to other sites (−0.3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
141
Assets fetched
186
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
3 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

327 of 338 discovered URLs were fetched, 11 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 120 left unchecked.

  • Title tags28 issues
    28 of 131 pages have title issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Meta descriptions39 issues
    39 of 131 pages have meta description issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 131 pages have heading issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 59 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 120 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 131 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 10 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 270 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 186 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    2 sitemaps listing 131 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts11 noted
    Internal link counts for 141 pages; 11 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 131 pages have fewer than 200 words. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 141 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 141 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives10 noted
    10 pages carry a robots directive; 131 carry none.
  • Anchor text21 noted
    21 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure21 noted
    21 of 131 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length8 noted
    8 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 141 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    141 of 131 indexable pages carry structured data: Organization (141), ListItem (130), BreadcrumbList (128), FAQPage (110), Question (110). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 131 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 141 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions2 noted
    2 of 131 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 327 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 141 pages; 14 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling385 noted
    385 words an English dictionary does not know, on 117 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2331 sites, median 79%, average 78%

isupplementreviews.com scores 96%, higher than 96% of the 2331 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites96% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site is performing well with a health score of 96/100, but there are some title and meta description issues that can be addressed to improve SEO. A 404 error also needs fixing.

  1. 1

    Fix 404 Error

    Why: The sitemap URL returns a 404 error, impacting crawlability.

    How: Check the sitemap URL and ensure it is correctly placed. If not, generate or upload a valid sitemap.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 28 pages have short titles, affecting visibility in search results.

    How: Update title tags to be between 30-60 characters, making them clearer and more descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 39 pages with issues may have cut-off content in search results.

    How: Rewrite meta descriptions ensuring they are ideally under 160 characters and compelling.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security deficiencies that expose it to various risks, including the lack of important HTTP headers. Implementing these headers is essential for securing the site against attacks such as clickjacking and content injection.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 0 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors typing the URL without HTTPS can be intercepted on the first request.

    Fix: Add the header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of a CSP allows scripts, styles, and frames to load from any source, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded in frames and could be vulnerable to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: The lack of this header means the site could expose unused features to potential attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: `Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()`.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://isupplementreviews.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/affiliate-disclosure/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/compare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/categories/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/ingredients/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/guides/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/how-we-review/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/prostavive-review/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/femicore-review/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/prodentim-review/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 141 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://isupplementreviews.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/affiliate-disclosure/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/compare/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/categories/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/ingredients/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/guides/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/how-we-review/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/prostavive-review/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/femicore-review/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/prodentim-review/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://isupplementreviews.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/affiliate-disclosure/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/compare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/categories/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/ingredients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/guides/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/how-we-review/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/prostavive-review/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/femicore-review/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/prodentim-review/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://isupplementreviews.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/affiliate-disclosure/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/reviews/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/compare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/categories/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/ingredients/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/guides/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/how-we-review/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/prostavive-review/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/femicore-review/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://isupplementreviews.com/prodentim-review/ → no permissions-policy
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 141 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 141 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 141 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    Scripts from 1 other domain all carry Subresource Integrity hashes.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near isupplementreviews.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling isupplementreviews.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own isupplementreviews.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming isupplementreviews.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.