Scanned sites / inglewooddoggysalon.com

SEO report for inglewooddoggysalon.com DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of inglewooddoggysalon.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/inglewooddoggysalon-com/2026-09-12-2122.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 21:22:57 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 21:42:43 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

88/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 30 pages and 98 assets of inglewooddoggysalon.com, starting from https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/. It scored 88 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (19), meta descriptions (6), thin content (6); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.8), meta descriptions (−1.7), thin content (−1.7). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
30
Assets fetched
98
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

128 of 130 discovered URLs were fetched, 2 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags19 issues
    19 of 27 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.8 points
  • Meta descriptions6 issues
    6 of 27 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.7 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 27 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites58 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 4 destinations checked.
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 28 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.7 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 75 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 98 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    1 sitemap listing 26 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 28 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content6 issues
    6 of 27 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.7 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 30 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 28 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives28 noted
    28 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 27 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length3 noted
    3 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 28 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 128 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 28 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 55 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

inglewooddoggysalon.com scores 88%, higher than 80% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites88% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Improvements needed include fixing redirect URLs, resolving non-200 response issues, updating title tags, enhancing meta descriptions, ensuring proper indexability, and adding content to thin pages. Implement these changes for better visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirecting URLs can confuse users and search engines.

    How: Update links directly to the final destination without redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages returning non-200 statuses impact accessibility and SEO.

    How: Ensure all URLs return a 200 status by correcting the links.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improper title length affects search visibility.

    How: Adjust titles to be under 60 characters for optimal display.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Short meta descriptions reduce click-through rates.

    How: Revise them to be between 70-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Ensure Proper Indexability

    Why: Warnings can hinder page visibility in search results.

    How: Check robots settings and ensure canonical tags are correct.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Add Content to Thin Pages

    Why: Thin content pages may not rank well in search engines.

    How: Augment these pages with relevant content to exceed 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website inglewooddoggysalon.com has multiple security vulnerabilities that could expose it to attacks or data leaks. Key issues include a lack of a Content Security Policy, missing MIME sniffing protection headers, and using outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities. Immediate action is needed to secure the site by addressing these findings.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the browser can load scripts, styles, and frames from any source, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header, e.g., `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` on all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Outdated jQuery VersionMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 1.8.3 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities, which could be exploited depending on its use.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to mitigate identified vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key could lead to unauthorized access and misuse of the Google services tied to it.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage in the Google Cloud console by setting allowed HTTP referrers, and consider rotating the key.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: The absence of this header may allow browsers to interpret files incorrectly, potentially leading to code execution vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` on all HTML pages to prevent MIME type sniffing.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 28 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/home/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/about-us/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/about-us/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/anal-gland-draining/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/animal-nail-care/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/dog-grooming/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/ear-cleaning/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/service-areas/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/faq/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/home/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/about-us/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/about-us/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/anal-gland-draining/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/animal-nail-care/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/dog-grooming/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/ear-cleaning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/grooming-services/service-areas/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.8.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.8.3 in https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/wp-content/themes/ui16/scripts/jquery.min.js: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…cI (39 chars) in https://inglewooddoggysalon.com/category/dog-grooming/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • kit.fontawesome.com (28 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (28 script tags)
    • elfsightcdn.com (3 script tags)
    • www.google.com (28 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 28 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 28 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 28 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    29 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of inglewooddoggysalon.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near inglewooddoggysalon.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling inglewooddoggysalon.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own inglewooddoggysalon.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming inglewooddoggysalon.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.