Scanned sites / imagegpt.com / 2026-11-01-0004

imagegpt.com scan from 2026-11-01 00:04:23 UTC DR 27

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-01-0004

Scanned 2026-11-01 00:04:23 UTC, finished 2026-11-01 00:27:00 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://imagegpt.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On November 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 5000 pages and 62 assets of imagegpt.com, starting from https://imagegpt.com/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (4,708), heavy assets (10), title tags (2,233); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.7), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.6). 16 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
5000
Assets fetched
62
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 33
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

5,062 of 5,062 discovered URLs were fetched, 112,194 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 3 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags2,233 issues
    2233 of 4810 pages have title issues. 68 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.6 points
  • Meta descriptions4,708 issues
    4708 of 4810 pages have meta description issues. 68 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.7 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 4810 pages have heading issues. 68 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites51 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 3 destinations checked.
  • Redirects58 issues
    122 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses122 noted
    122 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 122 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability20 issues
    20 of 4877 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 237193 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 62 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage836 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 6,213+ URLs (first 5,000 entries read): 704 crawled pages missing, 122 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 10 reachable only via the sitemap. 1,981 listed URLs not crawled within the 5000-page budget.
    −1 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin content251 issues
    251 of 4810 pages have fewer than 200 words. 68 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format49 noted
    49 of 5000 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals70 noted
    70 of 4878 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1 noted
    1 page carries a robots directive; 4877 carry none.
  • Anchor text30 noted
    30 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure50 noted
    50 of 4810 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 68 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length49 noted
    48 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validation938 noted
    938 of 4878 pages have HTML problems: 938 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflang15,994 noted
    3600 of 3638 pages with hreflang have problems: 15994 findings.
  • Structured data4,758 noted
    4804 of 4810 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (4804), ListItem (4804), Organization (4788), SoftwareApplication (4758), Offer (4758). 4758 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates3,246 noted
    3246 pages in 51 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 4878 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions57 noted
    57 of 4800 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 11 response headers recorded across 5062 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 4878 pages; 4817 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling38 noted
    38 words an English dictionary does not know, on 221 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2365 sites, median 79%, average 78%

imagegpt.com scores 80%, higher than 50% of the 2365 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 71 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 93 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 89 sites80%: 110 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 103 sites84%: 109 sites85%: 90 sites86%: 72 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 38 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has multiple issues concerning redirects, title tags, meta descriptions, and indexability. Prioritizing fixes for these will enhance overall SEO performance and visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Eliminating redirects improves user experience and crawl efficiency.

    How: Update the URLs to point directly to their final destination without redirection.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improved and unique title tags can enhance SERP visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Revise title tags for all affected pages, aiming for unique, descriptive titles within 50-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Unique meta descriptions can increase click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for list pages, ensuring they stay within 150-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Indexability Issues

    Why: Fixing indexability warnings ensures important pages are indexed correctly by search engines.

    How: Review pages flagged with indexability warnings to ensure proper canonical tags and sitemap inclusion.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing asset size improves page load times and overall site performance.

    How: Optimize the sizes of heavy assets identified, like favicons and images.

    Evidence: 2.9 KB of image, loaded by 4859 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    4,859 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Connecting orphan pages improves their discoverability and SEO value.

    How: Create internal links pointing to the orphan pages to integrate them into the site structure.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several serious security misconfigurations, including missing essential protection headers and insecure cookie settings. Immediate attention is required to mitigate risks of attacks like interception, clickjacking, and data exposure.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, connections may be intercepted if a user accesses via HTTP.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to HTTP responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to HTTP responses to restrict sources.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Frame-Options permits framing by potentially malicious sites.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to prevent clickjacking.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Cookies Lacking Security FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies are accessible to scripts and may be sent over unsecured connections.

    Fix: Set HttpOnly, Secure, and SameSite attributes for the 'imagegpt_session_id' cookie.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this, browsers may execute files as scripts based on their content.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to HTTP responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: No Referrer-Policy exposes full URLs to third-party sites on navigation.

    Fix: Add 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' to limit information shared.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exposing server details makes it easier for attackers to exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or mask the 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers in responses.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of this header leaves features like camera and microphone open to exploitation.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=()' to limit feature access.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://imagegpt.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/templates → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/docs → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/terms → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/privacy → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/contact → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/tools → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/models → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/gallery → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/pricing → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/use-cases → no strict-transport-security
    • https://imagegpt.com/?prompt=Explore+logo+ideas+that+stay+simple%2C+distinctive%2C+and+readable+at+small+sizes.+Do+not+… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 4878 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://imagegpt.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/templates → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/docs → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/terms → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/privacy → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/contact → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/tools → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/models → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/gallery → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/pricing → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/use-cases → no content-security-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/?prompt=Explore+logo+ideas+that+stay+simple%2C+distinctive%2C+and+readable+at+small+sizes.+Do+not+… → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://imagegpt.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/templates → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/docs → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/terms → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/privacy → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/contact → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/tools → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/models → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/gallery → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/pricing → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/use-cases → no x-frame-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/?prompt=Explore+logo+ideas+that+stay+simple%2C+distinctive%2C+and+readable+at+small+sizes.+Do+not+… → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://imagegpt.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/templates → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/docs → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/terms → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/privacy → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/contact → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/tools → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/models → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/gallery → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/pricing → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/use-cases → no x-content-type-options
    • https://imagegpt.com/?prompt=Explore+logo+ideas+that+stay+simple%2C+distinctive%2C+and+readable+at+small+sizes.+Do+not+… → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://imagegpt.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/templates → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/docs → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/terms → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/privacy → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/contact → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/tools → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/models → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/gallery → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/pricing → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/use-cases → no referrer-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/?prompt=Explore+logo+ideas+that+stay+simple%2C+distinctive%2C+and+readable+at+small+sizes.+Do+not+… → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://imagegpt.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/templates → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/docs → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/terms → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/privacy → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/contact → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/tools → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/models → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/gallery → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/pricing → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/use-cases → no permissions-policy
    • https://imagegpt.com/?prompt=Explore+logo+ideas+that+stay+simple%2C+distinctive%2C+and+readable+at+small+sizes.+Do+not+… → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Fly/366e4bf88 (2026-10-27) (5062 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Next.js (5000 responses)
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • imagegpt_session_id (set by https://imagegpt.com/) lacks HttpOnly
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.imagegpt.com (1053 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/
5 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 4878 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    70 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near imagegpt.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling imagegpt.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own imagegpt.com?