Scanned sites / hellogorgeousskinlab.com

SEO report for hellogorgeousskinlab.com DR 7

The latest Site Spider scan of hellogorgeousskinlab.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/hellogorgeousskinlab-com/2026-09-18-1608.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-18 16:08:52 UTC, finished 2026-09-18 16:10:50 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 18, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 10 pages and 63 assets of hellogorgeousskinlab.com, starting from http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by image alt text (207), meta descriptions (5), indexability (2); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to image alt text (−5.4), meta descriptions (−4.4), indexability (−2.2). 12 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: High2 high, 4 medium and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
10
Assets fetched
63
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

73 of 78 discovered URLs were fetched, 5 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 5 pages have title issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Meta descriptions5 issues
    5 of 5 pages have meta description issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.4 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 5 pages have heading issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites40 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 5 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 4 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −2.2 points
  • Image alt text207 issues
    207 of 232 image references have no alt attribute.
    −5.4 points
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 63 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.9 points
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 7 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 9 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 5 pages have fewer than 200 words. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.9 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 10 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals4 noted
    4 of 9 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives4 noted
    4 pages carry a robots directive; 5 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 5 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length11 noted
    10 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 15 response headers recorded across 73 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 9 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 79 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

hellogorgeousskinlab.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several SEO optimizations are needed to improve your site's performance. Key areas include fixing the 301 redirect, adding missing meta descriptions, alt text for images, and internal links for orphaned pages. Addressing these will enhance visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: A redirect affects user experience and may dilute link equity.

    How: Change the redirect status from 301 to direct access for /contact.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions can hinder click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create unique, compelling meta descriptions for about, aftercare, contact, and treatments pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Implement Image Alt Text

    Why: Adding alt text improves accessibility and SEO for non-visible content.

    How: Provide descriptive alt text for the 207 images missing alt attributes.

    Checks: images-alt

  4. 4

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Missing headings affect content structure and SEO.

    How: Add an H1 tag to the contact page.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Internal links improve navigation and indexability of the site.

    How: Add links from other relevant pages to the orphaned author pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down loading times, impacting user experience.

    How: Optimize or replace the three assets over 500 KB to lower file sizes.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities, primarily due to not using HTTPS and missing important security headers. This can expose user data to interception. Immediate actions are needed to secure your site and your users' information.

  • 2 high
  • 4 medium
  • 0 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Insecure HTTP TrafficHigh

    Why it matters: Your site serves pages over HTTP, making them vulnerable to interception and tampering.

    Fix: Ensure all pages are served over HTTPS by obtaining an SSL certificate and redirecting HTTP requests.

    Evidence: HTTPS

  2. 2

    Forms Transmit Data Over HTTPHigh

    Why it matters: Forms on your site send data over HTTP, exposing user input to potential interception.

    Fix: Serve all forms over HTTPS. Redirect users from HTTP to HTTPS or enforce HTTPS directly.

    Evidence: Forms over HTTPS

  3. 3

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of a Content Security Policy allows potential scripts to load from any source, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header to your HTML pages, e.g., 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  4. 4

    Cookie Flags MissingMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies on the site do not have protective flags, making them vulnerable to XSS attacks.

    Fix: Set the cookie flags: 'Set-Cookie: wordpress_test_cookie=...; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict'.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Your site uses outdated jQuery versions with known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Update jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 for security improvements.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An API key exposed in your source code can be misused by attackers.

    Fix: Restrict this API key in the Google Cloud Console to trusted referrer URLs.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Not setting a Permissions Policy exposes features not needed by your site.

    Fix: Add a Permissions-Policy header, e.g., 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self)'.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTPSHigh

    9 pages answered 200 over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS. Anyone on the network path can read or alter these pages.

    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/ → 200 over http
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/about/ → 200 over http
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/treatments/ → 200 over http
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/aftercare/ → 200 over http
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/contact/ → 200 over http
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/author/hellogorgeous/ → 200 over http
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/author/info-wax/ → 200 over http
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php → 200 over http
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword → 200 over http
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 9 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/treatments/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/aftercare/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/author/hellogorgeous/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/author/info-wax/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php → no content-security-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword → no content-security-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/treatments/ → no permissions-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/aftercare/ → no permissions-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/contact/ → no permissions-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/author/hellogorgeous/ → no permissions-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/author/info-wax/ → no permissions-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php → no permissions-policy
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • wordpress_test_cookie (set by http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php) lacks HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundForms over HTTPSHigh

    4 forms would send what visitors type over plain HTTP, where it can be read or changed on the way.

    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/author/hellogorgeous/ has 2 forms on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/author/info-wax/ has 2 forms on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php has a password field on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    3 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery 3.2.1, jQuery 1.9.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.12.4 in http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 3.2.1 in https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.min.js: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 1.9.1 in http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…E0 (39 chars) in http://hellogorgeousskinlab.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • ajax.googleapis.com (9 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (7 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 9 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 9 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    A referrer policy is set through a <meta name="referrer"> tag.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableHTTP Strict Transport Security

    No page was served over HTTPS, so this header does not apply yet.

  • Not applicableMixed content

    No page was served over HTTPS, so mixed content does not apply yet.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of hellogorgeousskinlab.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near hellogorgeousskinlab.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling hellogorgeousskinlab.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own hellogorgeousskinlab.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming hellogorgeousskinlab.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.