Scanned sites / headtotailpetspa.com

SEO report for headtotailpetspa.com DR 29

The latest Site Spider scan of headtotailpetspa.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/headtotailpetspa-com/2026-09-13-2037.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 20:37:36 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 20:45:17 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://headtotailpetspa.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 137 pages and 306 assets of headtotailpetspa.com, starting from https://headtotailpetspa.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (19), meta descriptions (60), headings (55); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−3.6), title tags (−2.5). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
137
Assets fetched
306
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

443 of 443 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 81 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags33 issues
    33 of 86 pages have title issues. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.5 points
  • Meta descriptions60 issues
    60 of 86 pages have meta description issues. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Headings55 issues
    55 of 86 pages have heading issues. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.5 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites285 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 23 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 81 destinations checked.
  • Redirects3 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    11 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 86 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 46 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text8 issues
    8 of 560 image references have no alt attribute. 6 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets19 issues
    19 assets larger than 500 KB among 306 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage22 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 67 URLs: 20 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link counts60 noted
    Internal link counts for 132 pages; 60 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 86 pages have fewer than 200 words. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format5 noted
    5 of 137 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals46 noted
    46 of 132 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives132 noted
    132 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text31 noted
    31 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure14 noted
    14 of 86 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length13 noted
    13 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 132 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 443 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 132 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 67 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

headtotailpetspa.com scores 84%, higher than 65% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues to address, particularly around broken links, redirects, titles, and meta descriptions. Prioritizing these fixes can improve your site's visibility significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: One broken link can lead to a poor user experience and harm SEO.

    How: Update or remove the broken link found at https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-and-nail/.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can slow down site performance and confuse users.

    How: Confirm and update the following redirects to lead directly to final URLs: /dog-grooming, /microbubble-bath, etc.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tags

    Why: Inconsistent or long title tags can negatively impact search rankings.

    How: Shorten titles for pages exceeding 60 characters and differentiate duplicate titles for blog pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are crucial for click-through rates in search results.

    How: Rewrite and differentiate descriptions for pages with issues and duplicates.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Proper headings enhance readability and SEO ranking.

    How: Add appropriate H1 tags to the pages lacking them.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap

    Why: A complete sitemap helps search engines index your pages effectively.

    How: Ensure your sitemap includes all relevant URLs, particularly blog pages and fix the broken URL.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that need attention, including missing headers for HSTS, Content Security Policy, Clickjacking protection, and outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities. Addressing these will help improve the overall security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on their first request, compromising security.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows scripts and resources from any origin, increasing cross-site scripting risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this protection, your pages are vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated jQuery Libraries with VulnerabilitiesMedium

    Why it matters: Two instances of jQuery are outdated and contain known vulnerabilities, risking security.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files inappropriately based on content rather than type.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/cat-grooming/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/local-pet-friendly-businesses/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/pet-grooming-appointment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/contacts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/team/brigit-willfong/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-nail/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-and-tidy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/full-grooming/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/pet-clip/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 132 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/cat-grooming/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/local-pet-friendly-businesses/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/pet-grooming-appointment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/contacts/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/team/brigit-willfong/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-nail/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-and-tidy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/full-grooming/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/pet-clip/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/cat-grooming/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/local-pet-friendly-businesses/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/pet-grooming-appointment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/contacts/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/team/brigit-willfong/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-nail/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-and-tidy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/full-grooming/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/pet-clip/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/cat-grooming/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/local-pet-friendly-businesses/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/pet-grooming-appointment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/contacts/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/team/brigit-willfong/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-nail/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/bath-and-tidy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/full-grooming/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://headtotailpetspa.com/services/pet-clip/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.1.0, jQuery 2.0.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.1.0 in https://headtotailpetspa.com/wp-content/cache/min/1/1570c7ca040e1523df4ab1ed10f…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 2.0.1 in https://headtotailpetspa.com/wp-content/plugins/quickcal/assets/js/spin.jquery.…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 6 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • pagead2.googlesyndication.com (40 script tags)
    • challenges.cloudflare.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (9 script tags)
    • olb.saloniris.com (1 script tag)
    • img1.wsimg.com (1 script tag)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 132 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    11 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of headtotailpetspa.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near headtotailpetspa.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling headtotailpetspa.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own headtotailpetspa.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming headtotailpetspa.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.