Scanned sites / graeberandcompany.com

SEO report for graeberandcompany.com DR 17

The latest Site Spider scan of graeberandcompany.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/graeberandcompany-com/2026-09-11-1411.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 14:11:32 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 14:25:45 UTC

Site: https://graeberandcompany.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 130 pages and 1000 assets of graeberandcompany.com, starting from https://graeberandcompany.com/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (63), meta descriptions (56), heavy assets (3); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−5.3), meta descriptions (−3.8), heavy assets (−1.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
130
Assets fetched
1000
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,130 of 1,131 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 119 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags63 issues
    63 of 119 pages have title issues.
    −5.3 points
  • Meta descriptions56 issues
    56 of 119 pages have meta description issues.
    −3.8 points
  • Headings33 issues
    33 of 119 pages have heading issues.
    −1.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites588 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 68 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 119 destinations checked.
  • Redirects11 issues
    17 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses17 noted
    17 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 11 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 119 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1834 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    7 sitemaps listing 119 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 5 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.3 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 119 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 119 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 130 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 119 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives119 noted
    119 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text85 noted
    85 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure34 noted
    34 of 119 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length56 noted
    33 images over 100 KB; 23 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 119 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1130 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 119 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 61 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2328 sites, median 79%, average 78%

graeberandcompany.com scores 87%, higher than 80% of the 2328 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a good health score but needs some improvements. Prioritize fixing redirect issues, title and meta description optimizations, and heading structure to enhance SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirect Issues

    Why: Redirects can dilute link equity and confuse users.

    How: Eliminate the chained redirect by redirecting the original URL directly to its final destination.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Correct Title Tag Issues

    Why: Title tags are crucial for SEO and user clicks; long titles can hurt rankings.

    How: Shorten titles to be under 60 characters for better visibility.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions influence click-through rates; short descriptions may not effectively summarize the content.

    How: Ensure all meta descriptions are between 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Headings Issues

    Why: Multiple H1 tags can confuse search engines regarding the main topic of a page.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and reclassify other headings appropriately.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are less likely to rank; internal links help distribute page authority.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to the orphan pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down page loading, affecting user experience.

    How: Optimize images and CSS files to reduce their sizes.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several critical security vulnerabilities related to missing HTTP response headers, which can expose it to various attacks. Implementing these headers will strengthen its defenses considerably.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows interception of requests when users type the address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows the loading of scripts and resources from any source, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: The absence of this header may allow browsers to execute files with incorrect MIME types.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external sources can be compromised and affect site behavior.

    Fix: Consider adding Subresource Integrity for all third-party scripts or implement a Content-Security-Policy to restrict sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public robots.txt file reveals a potentially sensitive path.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls are in place for the /wp-admin/ path. Consider removing it from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://graeberandcompany.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/hair-extensions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/haircuts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/hair-color/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/blonding/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/barber-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/blowouts-styling/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/keratin-treatments/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/facials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/hydrafacials/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 119 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://graeberandcompany.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/hair-extensions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/haircuts/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/hair-color/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/blonding/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/barber-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/blowouts-styling/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/keratin-treatments/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/facials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/hydrafacials/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://graeberandcompany.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/hair-extensions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/haircuts/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/hair-color/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/blonding/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/barber-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/blowouts-styling/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/keratin-treatments/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/facials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/hydrafacials/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://graeberandcompany.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/hair-extensions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/haircuts/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/hair-color/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/blonding/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/barber-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/blowouts-styling/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/services/keratin-treatments/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/facials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://graeberandcompany.com/facial-bar/hydrafacials/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 119 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of graeberandcompany.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near graeberandcompany.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling graeberandcompany.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own graeberandcompany.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming graeberandcompany.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.