Scanned sites / goodmenroofing.ca / 2026-10-01-0016

goodmenroofing.ca scan from 10/1/2026, 12:16:17 AM

Scan 2026-10-01-0016

Scanned 10/1/2026, 12:16:17 AM, finished 10/1/2026, 12:21:59 AM. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://goodmenroofing.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On October 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 19 pages and 228 assets of goodmenroofing.ca, starting from https://goodmenroofing.ca/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (16), heavy assets (25), headings (15); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.1), heavy assets (−6), headings (−5). 2 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
19
Assets fetched
228
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

247 of 247 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags5 issues
    5 of 16 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.8 points
  • Meta descriptions16 issues
    16 of 16 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.1 points
  • Headings15 issues
    15 of 16 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects1 issue
    7 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses23 noted
    23 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 16 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 32 image references have no alt attribute. 15 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets25 issues
    25 assets larger than 500 KB among 228 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 16 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 18 pages.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 16 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1629 sites, median 80%, average 79%

goodmenroofing.ca scores 77%, higher than 35% of the 1629 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0511010%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 2 sites38%: 2 sites39%: 0 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 0 sites45%: 3 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 3 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 5 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 7 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 6 sites55%: 3 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 5 sites58%: 10 sites59%: 5 sites60%: 9 sites61%: 11 sites62%: 15 sites63%: 15 sites64%: 10 sites65%: 18 sites66%: 18 sites67%: 31 sites68%: 25 sites69%: 22 sites70%: 35 sites71%: 37 sites72%: 47 sites73%: 39 sites74%: 46 sites75%: 53 sites76%: 60 sites77%: 59 sites78%: 75 sites79%: 57 sites80%: 80 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 80 sites83%: 78 sites84%: 71 sites85%: 55 sites86%: 57 sites87%: 52 sites88%: 56 sites89%: 47 sites90%: 31 sites91%: 34 sites92%: 22 sites93%: 11 sites94%: 13 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 6 sites97%: 7 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 53 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

You have several SEO issues that need addressing, particularly around titles, meta descriptions, and asset optimization. Prioritize these fixes for improved search visibility.

  1. 1

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: All pages lack meta descriptions affecting visibility.

    How: Write concise, relevant descriptions for each page. Aim for under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  2. 2

    Fix Title Tag Lengths

    Why: Incorrect title lengths can lead to truncation in search results.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters to ensure visibility in search snippets.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Correct Heading Structure

    Why: Multiple H1s are confusing for users and search engines.

    How: Limit each page to one H1 tag; use H2s and H3s for subheadings.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large images affect loading speed and user experience.

    How: Compress images or convert them to formats that are lighter.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  5. 5

    Internal Linking for Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages cannot be found by users or search engines.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several vulnerabilities related to security headers and cookie settings. Notably, it lacks essential protections against clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and improper cookie management. Implementing recommended headers will improve overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial HTTP requests can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Pages can be embedded in iframes, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Insecure Cookie FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies lack safety features, making them vulnerable to attacks.

    Fix: Set cookie to include: HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Pages could be exploited through MIME type confusion.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Third-party scripts can compromise site integrity if altered.

    Fix: Implement SRI for all external scripts or set a strict Content-Security-Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Permissions Policy Missing on Some PagesInfo

    Why it matters: Allows unnecessary features that could be exploited.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(self), camera=(self)

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/flat-roofing-services → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/steep-slope-roofing-services → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/asphalt-shingles-roofing-services → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/eco-friendly-roofing-services → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/metal-roofing-services → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/roof-replacement-services → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/roof-repair-services → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/careers → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/estimates → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/contact → no strict-transport-security
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/apply-now → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 18 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/flat-roofing-services → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/steep-slope-roofing-services → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/asphalt-shingles-roofing-services → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/eco-friendly-roofing-services → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/metal-roofing-services → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/roof-replacement-services → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/roof-repair-services → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/careers → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/estimates → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/contact → no x-frame-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/apply-now → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/flat-roofing-services → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/steep-slope-roofing-services → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/asphalt-shingles-roofing-services → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/eco-friendly-roofing-services → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/metal-roofing-services → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/roof-replacement-services → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/roof-repair-services → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/careers → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/estimates → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/contact → no x-content-type-options
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/apply-now → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    16 of 18 HTML pages send permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword → no permissions-policy
    • https://goodmenroofing.ca/wp-login.php → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • wordpress_test_cookie (set by https://goodmenroofing.ca/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword) lacks SameSite
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • app.aminos.ai (16 script tags)
10 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 18 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 18 pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    A referrer policy is set through a <meta name="referrer"> tag.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    6 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near goodmenroofing.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling goodmenroofing.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own goodmenroofing.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming goodmenroofing.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
goodmenroofing.ca scan 2026-10-01-0016 | DIY SEO Hub