Scanned sites / foot-notes.ca

SEO report for foot-notes.ca DR 11

The latest Site Spider scan of foot-notes.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/foot--notes-ca/2026-09-11-1816.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 18:16:41 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 18:33:57 UTC

Site: https://foot-notes.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 116 pages and 433 assets of foot-notes.ca, starting from https://foot-notes.ca/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (76), sitemap coverage (62), title tags (26); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−5.7), sitemap coverage (−3.5), title tags (−2.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
116
Assets fetched
433
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

549 of 549 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 50 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags26 issues
    26 of 95 pages have title issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.5 points
  • Meta descriptions76 issues
    76 of 95 pages have meta description issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.7 points
  • Headings11 issues
    11 of 95 pages have heading issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.4 points
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 9 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 15 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects6 issues
    51 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    55 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 10 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability4 issues
    4 of 97 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 9 pages noindex by design. 4 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.4 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 516 image references have no alt attribute. 36 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 433 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages57 issues
    57 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage62 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 100 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 57 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.5 points
  • Internal link counts11 noted
    Internal link counts for 106 pages; 11 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 95 pages have fewer than 200 words. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format10 noted
    10 of 116 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals10 noted
    10 of 106 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives106 noted
    106 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text57 noted
    57 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure82 noted
    82 of 95 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length17 noted
    17 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies43 noted
    43 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 549 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 106 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2325 sites, median 79%, average 78%

foot-notes.ca scores 82%, higher than 60% of the 2325 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several areas that need improvement, particularly broken links, redirects, title and meta description issues. Prioritizing these fixes will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links disrupt user experience and hurt SEO.

    How: Update or remove the links pointing to the 404 URLs: https://foot-notes.ca/kids-dance-classes/kids-dance-2-7/ and https://foot-notes.ca/kids-dance-classes/kids-dance-8-up/.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Redirect Issues

    Why: Redirect chains can slow down site performance and dilute link value.

    How: Eliminate the chain by directly linking to final URL: https://foot-notes.ca/classes/stagette/. Consider removing unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: URLs not returning a 200 status may be inaccessible to users and search engines.

    How: Check and fix 55 URLs not returning a 2xx response. Aim to resolve redirects leading to these URLs.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Title tags significantly impact search rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Revise 26 pages with issues. Ensure titles are concise (<60 characters) and unique.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Effective meta descriptions can boost your site's appeal in search results.

    How: Update 72 pages with missing or short meta descriptions to be clear and engaging.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structures improve accessibility and SEO.

    How: Address heading issues by ensuring each page has only one H1 and meaningful subheadings.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security vulnerabilities that could expose it to attacks. Key protections like HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and clickjacking protections are missing. Ensure these are implemented to enhance your site's defense against threats.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing your address without HTTPS can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts and other resources to load from any source, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a CSP header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options exposes your site to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this option, browsers may improperly execute files, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains could be compromised, allowing bad code to run on your site.

    Fix: Add a Content Security Policy that defines trusted script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Your robots.txt publicly reveals paths that should be secured, potentially aiding attackers.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using real access controls, not just robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://foot-notes.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/dance-music/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/virtual-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/studio-rental/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/cancellation-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level1/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level-3/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/twostep/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/wcs/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 106 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://foot-notes.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/dance-music/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/virtual-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/studio-rental/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/cancellation-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level1/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level-3/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/twostep/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/wcs/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://foot-notes.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/dance-music/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/virtual-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/studio-rental/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/cancellation-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level1/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level-3/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/twostep/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/wcs/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://foot-notes.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/dance-music/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/virtual-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/studio-rental/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/cancellation-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level1/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/level-3/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/twostep/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://foot-notes.ca/classes/wcs/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (41 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (2 script tags)
    • d1yw3duy3i4qiv.cloudfront.net (1 script tag)
    • app.amilia.com (14 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 106 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    83 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of foot-notes.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near foot-notes.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling foot-notes.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own foot-notes.ca?