Scanned sites / flyingcranchar.com

SEO report for flyingcranchar.com DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of flyingcranchar.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/flyingcranchar-com/2026-09-15-0100.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-15 01:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-15 01:09:46 UTC. Found on page 2 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://flyingcranchar.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On September 15, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 18 pages and 113 assets of flyingcranchar.com, starting from https://flyingcranchar.com/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (15), links to other sites (21), title tags (6); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−4), title tags (−3.8). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
18
Assets fetched
113
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

131 of 132 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 75 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags6 issues
    6 of 15 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Meta descriptions7 issues
    7 of 15 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 15 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.1 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −1.3 points
  • Links to other sites21 issues
    21 destinations answered with an error, 23 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 75 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.6 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 15 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 121 image references have no alt attribute. 8 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets15 issues
    15 assets larger than 500 KB among 113 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 14 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 16 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content6 issues
    6 of 15 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 18 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 16 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives15 noted
    15 pages carry a robots directive; 1 carries none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 15 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 16 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 131 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 16 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 61 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2513 sites, median 80%, average 78%

flyingcranchar.com scores 75%, higher than 30% of the 2513 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 37 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 74 sites74%: 73 sites75%: 77 sites76%: 89 sites77%: 99 sites78%: 115 sites79%: 100 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 113 sites83%: 113 sites84%: 118 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 78 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 54 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

There are several SEO issues on your site that need attention, particularly with broken links, redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions. Addressing these will improve user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the link to https://flyingcranchar.com/faq/.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can slow down site performance and confuse users.

    How: Directly link to the final versions of URLs: /farm-fresh-beef/ and /sitemap_index.xml.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Short title tags limit SEO potential.

    How: Update titles to be descriptive, aiming for at least 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing or short meta descriptions reduce click-through rates.

    How: Add or expand descriptions on affected pages, targeting 70 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings

    Why: Missing H1 tags affect page structure and SEO.

    How: Add an H1 tag to contact and FAQ category pages.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Increase Content Quality

    Why: Thin content impacts SEO ranking and user engagement.

    How: Enhance thin pages with additional relevant text to exceed 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site flyingcranchar.com has several security issues that could expose it to various risks, including content injection and clickjacking. Implementing recommended security headers will strengthen the site's defenses. Additionally, some scripts from third-party domains could increase the attack surface.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, there's no control over where scripts and content can load, making the site vulnerable to cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header, e.g., `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, pages can be framed by attackers, posing a risk of clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: The absence of a referrer policy can expose the full URL visited with query strings to third-party sites.

    Fix: Specify a Referrer-Policy header: `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer`.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Without IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains may be altered, leading to security risks if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Include Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or implement a Content-Security-Policy that restricts these hosts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of a permissions policy may allow unwanted access to sensitive features if scripts are injected.

    Fix: Add a Permissions-Policy header: `Permissions-Policy: geolocation=()`, etc.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The exposed '/wp-admin/' path in robots.txt could aid attackers in identifying sensitive areas.

    Fix: Ensure real access controls are in place for sensitive paths instead of relying on the robots.txt file.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 16 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://flyingcranchar.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/our-story/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/farm-fresh-beef/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/farm-store-products/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/frequently-asked-questions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/author/thinkadmin/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/how-do-you-feed-your-cows/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/do-you-sell-individual-cuts-of-beef/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/how-is-bulk-beef-priced/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/what-is-the-terminology/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://flyingcranchar.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/our-story/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/farm-fresh-beef/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/farm-store-products/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/frequently-asked-questions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/author/thinkadmin/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/how-do-you-feed-your-cows/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/do-you-sell-individual-cuts-of-beef/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/how-is-bulk-beef-priced/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/what-is-the-terminology/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://flyingcranchar.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/our-story/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/farm-fresh-beef/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/farm-store-products/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/frequently-asked-questions/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/contact/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/author/thinkadmin/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/how-do-you-feed-your-cows/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/do-you-sell-individual-cuts-of-beef/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/how-is-bulk-beef-priced/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/what-is-the-terminology/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://flyingcranchar.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/our-story/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/farm-fresh-beef/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/farm-store-products/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/frequently-asked-questions/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/contact/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/author/thinkadmin/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/how-do-you-feed-your-cows/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/do-you-sell-individual-cuts-of-beef/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/how-is-bulk-beef-priced/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://flyingcranchar.com/faq-items/what-is-the-terminology/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (16 script tags)
    • www.google.com (5 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 16 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 16 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 16 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    12 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of flyingcranchar.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near flyingcranchar.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling flyingcranchar.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own flyingcranchar.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming flyingcranchar.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.