Scanned sites / fargolawoffice.com

SEO report for fargolawoffice.com DR 3

The latest Site Spider scan of fargolawoffice.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/fargolawoffice-com/2026-09-13-2207.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 22:07:24 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 22:12:25 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://fargolawoffice.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

92/ 100Excellent

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 12 pages and 101 assets of fargolawoffice.com, starting from https://fargolawoffice.com/. It scored 92 out of 100, an excellent result. 2 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (6), redirects (4); 18 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), redirects (−2). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
12
Assets fetched
101
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
2 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

113 of 122 discovered URLs were fetched, 9 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 5 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 8 pages have title issues.
  • Meta descriptions6 issues
    6 of 8 pages have meta description issues.
    −6 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 8 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites7 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 3 destinations checked.
  • Redirects4 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −2 points
  • Non-200 responses5 noted
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 8 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 89 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 101 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    2 sitemaps listing 8 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 8 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 8 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 12 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 8 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives8 noted
    8 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text5 noted
    5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 8 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 8 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 113 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 8 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance ? on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2553 sites, median 80%, average 78%

fargolawoffice.com scores 92%, higher than 92% of the 2553 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591180%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 74 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 76 sites74%: 76 sites75%: 78 sites76%: 92 sites77%: 103 sites78%: 115 sites79%: 103 sites80%: 118 sites81%: 112 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 116 sites84%: 118 sites85%: 95 sites86%: 80 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 66 sites89%: 71 sites90%: 47 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 20 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 15 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites92% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has excellent health but needs attention on redirects, non-200 responses, and meta descriptions for optimal SEO performance. Addressing these will enhance user experience and improve search engine rankings.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 5 URLs are redirecting, impacting crawl efficiency.

    How: Update the URLs to direct traffic straight to the final page instead of redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Correct Non-200 Responses

    Why: 5 URLs not returning a 2xx status can harm user access and SEO.

    How: Identify these URLs and ensure they return a proper 200 status or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 2 pages have short meta descriptions, which can hurt click-through rates.

    How: Revise the meta descriptions to be longer than 70 characters and more descriptive.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security issues that may expose it to potential risks. Key concerns include a lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and Clickjacking protection, which can compromise user security. Additionally, outdated JavaScript libraries could have known vulnerabilities. Addressing these issues promptly will enhance your site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: No HTTP Strict Transport Security header means interception risk when users enter the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Absence of Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: No Content Security Policy allows scripts and styles to load from any source, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header (e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';).

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options permits the site's pages to be framed by malicious sites, risking user security.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use CSP with the frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Outdated libraries like jQuery and Moment.js have known vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to 3.5.0 and Moment.js to 2.29.4.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Exposed Server VersionLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server version helps attackers identify potential vulnerabilities specific to the software.

    Fix: Consider hiding the server version or using a more generic banner (e.g., Server: MyServer).

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://fargolawoffice.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/family-law-attorney/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/estate-probate-lawyer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/civil-and-business-lawyer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/criminal-attorney/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/fargo-attorneys/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 8 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://fargolawoffice.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/family-law-attorney/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/estate-probate-lawyer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/civil-and-business-lawyer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/criminal-attorney/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/fargo-attorneys/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://fargolawoffice.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/family-law-attorney/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/estate-probate-lawyer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/civil-and-business-lawyer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/criminal-attorney/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargolawoffice.com/fargo-attorneys/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Flywheel/5.1.0 (113 responses)
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.4.24, Moment.js 2.13.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.4.24 in https://fargolawoffice.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jque…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • Moment.js 2.13.0 in https://fargolawoffice.com/wp-content/plugins/xray-client-basic-505/inc/moment.…: CVE-2022-24785 (path traversal in locale loading), CVE-2022-31129 (ReDoS in string parsing); fixed in 2.29.4
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (16 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 8 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 8 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    7 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of fargolawoffice.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near fargolawoffice.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling fargolawoffice.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own fargolawoffice.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming fargolawoffice.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.