Scanned sites / esenciasalonandspa.ca / 2026-09-14-1804

esenciasalonandspa.ca scan from 2026-09-14 18:04:42 UTC DR 5

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-1804

Scanned 2026-09-14 18:04:42 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 18:15:37 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

91/ 100Excellent

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 134 pages and 124 assets of esenciasalonandspa.ca, starting from https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/. It scored 91 out of 100, an excellent result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (46), meta descriptions (36), redirects (26); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−4.3), meta descriptions (−2.7), redirects (−1). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
134
Assets fetched
124
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

258 of 261 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 7 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags46 issues
    46 of 107 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Meta descriptions36 issues
    36 of 107 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 107 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites218 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 7 destinations checked.
  • Redirects26 issues
    26 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses27 noted
    27 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 26 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 108 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 239 image references have no alt attribute. 12 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 124 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    1 sitemap listing 103 URLs: 5 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.3 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 108 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 107 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 134 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 108 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives108 noted
    108 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text28 noted
    28 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure49 noted
    49 of 107 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length3 noted
    3 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 108 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 258 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 108 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 53 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

esenciasalonandspa.ca scores 91%, higher than 87% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites91% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

You have some important SEO fixes to make, particularly regarding redirects, non-200 responses, and title/meta issues. Addressing these can improve user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Many URLs redirect unnecessarily, confusing users and search engines.

    How: Update links or remove redirects for these pages: /beauty-salon/, /blog/, /esthetician/, /eyebrow-tinting/, /eyelash-extensions/.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all pages return a proper status to avoid losing traffic.

    How: Check the affected URLs and make sure they return a 200 status code instead of redirects.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 46 pages have title issues, impacting search rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to be within 30-60 characters. For instance, change /about-us/blog/ to 'Esencia Salon Blog'.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 32 meta descriptions are erroneous, leading to suboptimal search results.

    How: Rewrite descriptions to be under 160 characters and more compelling. For example, update /about-us/ to a concise summary.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Proper headings improve readability and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 and use H2s appropriately. Fix pages like /2026/07/06/our-first-post/ by removing the extra H1.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Some indexable pages are missing from the sitemap, reducing discoverability.

    How: Update your sitemap to include pages: /, /category/hair-salon/, /policy/cookie-policy/, /policy/privacy-policy/, /policy/terms-of-service/.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that need addressing. The absence of a Content Security Policy poses a risk of malicious script execution. Additionally, you're using an outdated version of jQuery with known vulnerabilities, and missing MIME sniffing protection can allow browsers to misinterpret file types. Immediate attention to these issues will enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to restrict sources of content like scripts and styles. Example: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Using Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.8.3 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on your site's usage.

    Fix: Update jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to patch these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers may execute files as scripts based on content instead of type.

    Fix: Add an X-Content-Type-Options header to prevent this. Example: `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 108 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/home/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/about-us/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/about-us/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/gel-and-acrylic-nails/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-color/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-extensions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-relaxer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-salon/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-styling/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/home/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/about-us/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/about-us/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/gel-and-acrylic-nails/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-color/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-extensions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-relaxer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-salon/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/services/hair-styling/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.8.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.8.3 in https://esenciasalonandspa.ca/wp-content/themes/bty/scripts/jquery.min.js: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • kit.fontawesome.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • policies.termageddon.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 108 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 108 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 108 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    41 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near esenciasalonandspa.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling esenciasalonandspa.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own esenciasalonandspa.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming esenciasalonandspa.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.