Scanned sites / ecasask.ca / 2026-09-13-2008

ecasask.ca scan from 2026-09-13 20:08:18 UTC DR 29

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-2008

Scanned 2026-09-13 20:08:18 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 20:13:40 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://ecasask.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 73 pages and 187 assets of ecasask.ca, starting from https://ecasask.ca/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (32), meta descriptions (37), thin content (21); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−5.1), meta descriptions (−4.7), thin content (−2.7). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
73
Assets fetched
187
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

260 of 260 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 123 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags32 issues
    32 of 37 pages have title issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.1 points
  • Meta descriptions37 issues
    37 of 37 pages have meta description issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.7 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 37 pages have heading issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links4 issues
    4 internal links point at 4 broken URLs.
    −1.3 points
  • Links to other sites5 issues
    5 destinations answered with an error, 45 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 123 destinations checked.
    −2 points
  • Redirects7 noted
    7 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses4 issues
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 10 of them are pages, 4 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.6 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability3 issues
    3 of 60 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 3 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 101 image references have no alt attribute. 15 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 187 fetched assets. 7 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages19 issues
    19 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage22 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 46 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 6 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 13 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.1 points
  • Internal link counts6 noted
    Internal link counts for 63 pages; 6 worth a look.
  • Thin content21 issues
    21 of 37 pages have fewer than 200 words. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format24 noted
    24 of 73 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals23 noted
    23 of 63 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives63 noted
    63 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure36 noted
    36 of 37 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length6 noted
    6 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 63 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 260 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 63 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 68 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

ecasask.ca scores 79%, higher than 44% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

There are critical issues with broken links, redirects, and missing titles/meta descriptions. Addressing these will improve SEO and user experience significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the links to the broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages should return a 200 response for accessibility and SEO.

    How: Check and fix the URLs that return 301/302 responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Add Title Tags

    Why: Titles are essential for search visibility.

    How: Create informative title tags for the pages with issues.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Create Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions improve click-through rates.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for all pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heavy Assets

    Why: Large files can slow down your website.

    How: Optimize or compress heavy assets to reduce load times.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are not accessible to users.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from relevant sections.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website needs important security enhancements to protect against potential threats. Key issues include missing security headers and the use of outdated libraries with known vulnerabilities. Addressing these will help safeguard user data and improve site integrity.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on initial requests if they don't use HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows your pages to be potentially embedded in frames, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Vulnerable jQuery LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Two versions of jQuery in use (1.9.1 and 3.1.0) have known vulnerabilities that could be exploited based on site usage.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret file types, leading to potential security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://ecasask.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/login/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/membership-account/membership-levels/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/membership/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/contractors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/engineers-associations/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/suppliers-manufacturers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/committees/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/registered-contractors-program/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://ecasask.ca/safety-training/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    17 of 63 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://ecasask.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/membership-account/membership-levels/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/membership/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/contractors/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/engineers-associations/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/suppliers-manufacturers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/committees/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/registered-contractors-program/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/safety-training/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/newsletters/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://ecasask.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/login/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/membership-account/membership-levels/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/membership/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/contractors/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/engineers-associations/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/suppliers-manufacturers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/committees/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/registered-contractors-program/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ecasask.ca/safety-training/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery 3.1.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://ecasask.ca/wp-content/themes/ecas/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=7.0.4: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 3.1.0 in https://ecasask.ca/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.min.j…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (9 script tags)
    • js.stripe.com (8 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 63 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 17 of 63 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    58 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near ecasask.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling ecasask.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own ecasask.ca?