Scanned sites / earthwithin.com

SEO report for earthwithin.com DR 17

The latest Site Spider scan of earthwithin.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/earthwithin-com/2026-09-12-0001.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 00:01:58 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 06:59:02 UTC

Site: https://earthwithin.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

72/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 327 pages and 1271 assets of earthwithin.com, starting from https://earthwithin.com/. It scored 72 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (41), sitemap coverage (270), meta descriptions (171); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.5), meta descriptions (−4.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
327
Assets fetched
1271
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,598 of 1,709 discovered URLs were fetched, 111 blocked by robots.txt, 4,779 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 301 link destinations on other sites were checked, 663 left unchecked.

  • Title tags104 issues
    104 of 270 pages have title issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions171 issues
    171 of 270 pages have meta description issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.6 points
  • Headings159 issues
    159 of 270 pages have heading issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.2 points
  • Broken links18 issues
    325 internal links point at 18 broken URLs.
    −1.2 points
  • Links to other sites16 issues
    16 destinations answered with an error, 30 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 663 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −2.1 points
  • Redirects13 issues
    14 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses18 issues
    32 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 31 of them are pages, 18 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.6 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability22 issues
    22 of 292 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 4 pages noindex by design.
    −0.7 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1980 image references have no alt attribute. 909 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets41 issues
    41 assets larger than 500 KB among 1271 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage270 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 270 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.5 points
  • Internal link counts192 noted
    Internal link counts for 296 pages; 192 worth a look.
  • Thin content16 issues
    16 of 270 pages have fewer than 200 words. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 327 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals24 noted
    24 of 296 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives296 noted
    296 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text134 noted
    134 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure53 noted
    53 of 270 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length160 noted
    156 images over 100 KB; 4 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 296 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1598 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 296 pages; 222 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2330 sites, median 79%, average 78%

earthwithin.com scores 72%, higher than 23% of the 2330 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites72% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

To improve your site, prioritize fixing broken links, non-200 responses, title tags, and meta descriptions. A sitemap that includes all pages is also essential for better indexing. Enhancing your content quality can drive more engagement.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Reducing broken links improves user experience and site credibility.

    How: Identify the broken links and update or remove them; ensure they point to the correct pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can hinder site accessibility and search engine indexing.

    How: Review the URLs that return non-200 responses and correct their status by either updating links or fixing server errors.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Enhancing title tags can improve click-through rates and SEO performance.

    How: Revise title tags to ensure they are concise, under 60 characters, and accurately reflect the page content.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions affect click-through rates on search results.

    How: Create unique and compelling meta descriptions for the pages that lack them, ideally between 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Create Comprehensive Sitemap

    Why: An updated sitemap helps search engines properly index your site.

    How: Generate a new sitemap that includes all relevant pages and ensure it is uploaded to the site.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Enhance Thin Content

    Why: Improving content quality encourages user engagement and positive SEO effects.

    How: Add valuable content to pages with fewer than 200 words, making sure it's relevant and informative.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of earthwithin.com reveals several missing security headers that could expose the site to various attacks. High-priority items include a lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and protections against clickjacking. Implementing the suggested headers will significantly enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Implement the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is at risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks and data injection vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Implement the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options (Clickjacking Protection)Medium

    Why it matters: The lack of X-Frame-Options allows other sites to embed your pages in a frame, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Implement the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options (MIME Sniffing Protection)Low

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files' types, which could lead to code execution vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Implement the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be modified to include malicious code if compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that limits script sources or use Subresource Integrity, where applicable.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Private Path Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Sensitive paths should not be exposed in robots.txt as it can act as a map for attackers.

    Fix: Move sensitive directories behind proper authentication and restrict access appropriately.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://earthwithin.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/missoula-floral-design-workshops/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/floral-design-workshops/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/wedding-flowers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/portfolio/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/dried-wedding-flowers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/a-la-carte/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/flower-shop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/floral-arrangement-delivery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/dried-flower-arrangements/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://earthwithin.com/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 296 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://earthwithin.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/missoula-floral-design-workshops/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/floral-design-workshops/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/wedding-flowers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/portfolio/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/dried-wedding-flowers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/a-la-carte/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/flower-shop/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/floral-arrangement-delivery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/dried-flower-arrangements/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://earthwithin.com/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 296 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://earthwithin.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/missoula-floral-design-workshops/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/floral-design-workshops/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/wedding-flowers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/portfolio/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/dried-wedding-flowers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/a-la-carte/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/flower-shop/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/floral-arrangement-delivery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/dried-flower-arrangements/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://earthwithin.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/missoula-floral-design-workshops/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/floral-design-workshops/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/wedding-flowers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/portfolio/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/dried-wedding-flowers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/a-la-carte/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/flower-shop/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/floral-arrangement-delivery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/dried-flower-arrangements/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://earthwithin.com/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
    • js.stripe.com (4 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 296 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    128 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of earthwithin.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near earthwithin.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling earthwithin.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own earthwithin.com?