Scanned sites / discoveringmontana.com
SEO report for discoveringmontana.com DR 55
The latest Site Spider scan of discoveringmontana.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/discoveringmontana-com/2026-09-14-0532.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Latest scan
Scanned 2026-09-14 05:32:28 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 07:03:47 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results
Site: https://discoveringmontana.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1546 pages and 1005 assets of discoveringmontana.com, starting from https://discoveringmontana.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), sitemap coverage (1,469), title tags (530); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.7), title tags (−3.4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 1546
- Assets fetched
- 1005
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 10 of 27
2,551 of 2,551 discovered URLs were fetched, 1,626 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 604 link destinations on other sites were checked, 15238 left unchecked.
- Title tags530 issues530 of 1470 pages have title issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.4 points
- Meta descriptions197 issues197 of 1470 pages have meta description issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−1 points
- Headings4 issues4 of 1470 pages have heading issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links2 issues2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites6 issues6 destinations answered with an error, 57 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 15238 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.−0.2 points
- Redirects1 issue2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses2 issues4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability2 issues2 of 1471 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 72 pages noindex by design.
- Image alt textOK0 of 4477 image references have no alt attribute. 6 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets10 issues10 assets larger than 500 KB among 1005 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage1,469 issues1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 1469 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.−5.7 points
- Internal link counts54 notedInternal link counts for 500 pages; 54 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 1470 pages have fewer than 200 words. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format4 noted4 of 1546 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals73 noted73 of 1543 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives1,543 noted1543 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text881 noted881 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure94 noted94 of 1470 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length45 noted45 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404s2 noted2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 2551 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1543 pages; 1353 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights4 notedMobile performance 94 on average across 5 pages; 4 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this site sits among all scanned sites
2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%
discoveringmontana.com scores 84%, higher than 65% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
The site has a solid health score but requires urgent fixes for broken links, redirects, missing H1s, and sitemap coverage. Prioritizing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: Improving user experience and maintaining site credibility.
How: Remove or update the two internal broken links to valid URLs.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Resolve Redirects
Why: Reducing unnecessary redirects improves page load speed and SEO.
How: Update any internal links to point directly to the final URLs instead of those that redirect.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Add Missing H1 Tags
Why: H1 tags are crucial for SEO and navigation.
How: Add a unique H1 tag to the four identified pages that are missing them.
Checks: headings
- 4
Update Sitemap Coverage
Why: Ensuring all indexable pages are in the sitemap enhances discoverability.
How: Include the indexable pages missing in the sitemap to facilitate crawling.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
- 5
Optimize Title Tags
Why: Enhancing title tags can improve click-through rates.
How: Shorten the over-60 character title tags for clarity and effectiveness.
Checks: titles
- 6
Fix Meta Description Issues
Why: Improving meta descriptions boosts search visibility.
How: Add missing meta descriptions and shorten those that exceed 160 characters.
Checks: meta-descriptions
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThis review identifies security headers that are missing from your site, which could expose visitors to certain risks. Key findings include the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security and protections against clickjacking, both of which are important for user safety. Implementing these protections will enhance your site's security posture.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors using HTTP can be intercepted on the first request.
Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to all responses.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: Absence of this header allows clickjacking risks, where your site can be embedded in a malicious frame.
Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to all responses.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly execute files as scripts based on their content.
Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to all responses.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 4
Third-Party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low
Why it matters: Scripts from other domains can change if those domains are compromised, risking site integrity.
Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for scripts, or use a Content-Security-Policy (CSP) that restricts sources.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://discoveringmontana.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/things-to-do/dude-ranches-montana/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/family-resorts-in-montana/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/best-resorts-for-couples/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/rv-parks/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/glacier-national-park/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/yellowstone/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/unique-places-to-stay-in-montana/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/regions/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/glacier-country/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://discoveringmontana.com/central-montana/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://discoveringmontana.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/things-to-do/dude-ranches-montana/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/family-resorts-in-montana/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/best-resorts-for-couples/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/rv-parks/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/glacier-national-park/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/yellowstone/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/unique-places-to-stay-in-montana/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/regions/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/glacier-country/ → no x-frame-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/central-montana/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://discoveringmontana.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/things-to-do/dude-ranches-montana/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/family-resorts-in-montana/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/best-resorts-for-couples/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/rv-parks/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/glacier-national-park/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/where-to-stay/yellowstone/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/unique-places-to-stay-in-montana/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/regions/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/glacier-country/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://discoveringmontana.com/central-montana/ → no x-content-type-options
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- static.getclicky.com (40 script tags)
- www.instagram.com (1 script tag)
8 checks passed, 4 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 1543 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
103 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries
No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Earlier scans of discoveringmontana.com
No other scans of this site yet.
Sites scoring near discoveringmontana.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- tworiversvet.comDR 884/100 · rank 874 · 178 pages
- www.azpest.comDR 3484/100 · rank 874 · 59 pages
- expressionsdental.caDR 1084/100 · rank 874 · 463 pages
- chiropractormt.comDR 384/100 · rank 874 · 26 pages
- patspetsregina.caDR 684/100 · rank 874 · 8 pages
- cars24x7.caDR 184/100 · rank 874 · 71 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling discoveringmontana.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own discoveringmontana.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming discoveringmontana.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.