Scanned sites / destinationmissoula.org / 2026-09-11-1821

destinationmissoula.org scan from 2026-09-11 18:21:42 UTC DR 58

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1821

Scanned 2026-09-11 18:21:42 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 16:43:44 UTC

Site: https://destinationmissoula.org/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

62/ 100Needs work

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4997 pages and 420 assets of destinationmissoula.org, starting from https://destinationmissoula.org/. It scored 62 out of 100, a result that needs work. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (2,789), title tags (2,216), meta descriptions (1,989); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−10), title tags (−7.9), meta descriptions (−5.7). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
4997
Assets fetched
420
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

5,417 of 5,422 discovered URLs were fetched, 2 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 371 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1956 left unchecked.

  • Title tags2,216 issues
    2216 of 2789 pages have title issues.
    −7.9 points
  • Meta descriptions1,989 issues
    1989 of 2789 pages have meta description issues.
    −5.7 points
  • Headings49 issues
    49 of 2789 pages have heading issues.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links202 issues
    1391 internal links point at 202 broken URLs.
    −1.4 points
  • Links to other sites9 issues
    9 destinations answered with an error, 82 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1956 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects2,007 issues
    2003 redirecting URLs, 297 of them chained.
    −2.9 points
  • Non-200 responses206 issues
    2214 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2208 of them are pages, 206 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2,789 issues
    2789 of 2789 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −10 points
  • Image alt text2,944 issues
    2944 of 41358 image references have no alt attribute. 1197 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.4 points
  • Heavy assets9 issues
    9 assets larger than 500 KB among 420 fetched assets. 8 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −5.4 points
  • Orphan pages6 issues
    6 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1,395 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://destinationmissoula.org/sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts500 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 500 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2789 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate content3 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1,939 noted
    1939 of 4997 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2,789 noted
    2789 of 2789 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 2789 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text1,681 noted
    1681 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2,384 noted
    2384 of 2789 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length243 noted
    241 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2789 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 5417 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2789 pages; 2604 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 39 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2866 sites, median 80%, average 79%

destinationmissoula.org scores 62%, higher than 6% of the 2866 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 10 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 76 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites62% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues that need addressing. Focus on fixing broken links, redirects, and missing title tags to improve user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Improves user experience and reduces 404 errors.

    How: Identify the broken links from the crawl and update or remove them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: Reduces load time and improves SEO by cleaning up redirects.

    How: Locate chained redirects and either consolidate them or update direct links.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Improves website reliability and user access.

    How: Check URLs that return errors and fix or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Enhances SEO and click-through rates in search results.

    How: Edit titles to ensure they are unique, descriptive, and within the character limit.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Complete Meta Descriptions

    Why: Improves search visibility and CTR.

    How: Write compelling meta descriptions for pages missing them or exceeding length.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Create a Sitemap

    Why: Guides search engines in indexing your site effectively.

    How: Generate a sitemap and host it at /sitemap.xml.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities that need addressing to protect users and their data. Key issues include the lack of strict HTTPS enforcement, absence of a Content Security Policy, mixed content loading, and outdated JavaScript libraries. These deficiencies could expose your site to various security risks.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on their first HTTP request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows scripts and resources from potentially harmful sources.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' cdn.jsdelivr.net cdnjs.cloudflare.com glaciermt.com www.googletagmanager.com www.google.com; frame-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using an outdated jQuery version exposes the site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery from 3.4.1 to at least 3.5.0 to mitigate vulnerabilities CVE-2020-11022 and CVE-2020-11023.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP can expose users to man-in-the-middle attacks.

    Fix: Change HTTP URLs to HTTPS, e.g., change http://destinationmissoula.org/assets/img/where-is-missoula-graphic.png to https://destinationmissoula.org/assets/img/where-is-missoula-graphic.png.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Without Subresource Integrity, external scripts can be compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or use a Content-Security-Policy to restrict sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://destinationmissoula.org/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/about-missoula → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/where-is-missoula → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/downtown-missoula → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/glacial-lake-missoula → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/history → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/lewis-and-clark → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/four-seasons → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/weather → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/university-of-montana → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/missoula-midtown → no strict-transport-security
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/services → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 2789 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://destinationmissoula.org/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/about-missoula → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/where-is-missoula → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/downtown-missoula → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/glacial-lake-missoula → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/history → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/lewis-and-clark → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/four-seasons → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/weather → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/university-of-montana → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/missoula-midtown → no content-security-policy
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/services → no content-security-policy
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    2 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://destinationmissoula.org/where-is-missoula loads image http://destinationmissoula.org/assets/img/where-is-missoula-graphic.png
    • https://destinationmissoula.org/where-is-missoula loads image http://destinationmissoula.org/assets/img/where-is-missoula-graphic.png
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.4.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.4.1 in https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.min.js: CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 6 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (40 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (76 script tags)
    • glaciermt.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (3 script tags)
    • cdn.polyfill.io (1 script tag)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2789 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 2789 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 2789 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    85 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near destinationmissoula.org

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling destinationmissoula.org from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own destinationmissoula.org?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming destinationmissoula.org. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.