Scanned sites / cuelectric.net / 2026-09-13-2337

cuelectric.net scan from 2026-09-13 23:37:25 UTC DR 1

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-2337

Scanned 2026-09-13 23:37:25 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 23:48:40 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://cuelectric.net/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

65/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 9 pages and 369 assets of cuelectric.net, starting from https://cuelectric.net/. It scored 65 out of 100, a result that needs work. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (6), title tags (4), headings (6); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−8), title tags (−6.7), headings (−6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
9
Assets fetched
369
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

378 of 378 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags4 issues
    4 of 6 pages have title issues.
    −6.7 points
  • Meta descriptions6 issues
    6 of 6 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 6 pages have heading issues.
    −6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites24 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 4 destinations checked.
  • Redirects3 issues
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −2 points
  • Non-200 responses6 noted
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 6 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text12 issues
    12 of 57 image references have no alt attribute. 21 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −1.3 points
  • Heavy assets7 issues
    7 assets larger than 500 KB among 369 fetched assets.
    −4.2 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 6 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 6 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 6 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 9 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 6 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives6 noted
    6 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 6 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    2 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 6 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 378 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 6 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 62 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2384 sites, median 79%, average 78%

cuelectric.net scores 65%, higher than 10% of the 2384 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 45 sites71%: 71 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 71 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 94 sites78%: 109 sites79%: 90 sites80%: 111 sites81%: 107 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 105 sites84%: 110 sites85%: 90 sites86%: 73 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 67 sites90%: 38 sites91%: 48 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 18 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 13 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites65% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site needs urgent improvements regarding redirects, status codes, and content elements. Fixing these issues will positively impact SEO and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Improves user navigation and site structure.

    How: Remove unnecessary 301 redirects by updating links to the final URLs directly.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensures all pages are accessible to users and crawlers.

    How: Resolve the 404 error by replacing or removing missing assets. For 301s, set up proper internal links.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Enhances SEO and click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create unique title tags for all pages, ideally 50-60 characters long.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Modify Meta Descriptions

    Why: Improves visibility and ranking in search results.

    How: Shorten descriptions to under 160 characters and ensure uniqueness for each page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings

    Why: Improves content structure and SEO ranking.

    How: Include a clear H1 heading on each page that reflects the content accurately.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Set Image Alt Text

    Why: Enhances accessibility and SEO for images.

    How: Add descriptive alt attributes to images missing them.

    Checks: images-alt

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website cuelectric.net lacks several important security headers. Implementing these headers will significantly enhance the site's protection against various attacks, ensuring better safety for users and their data.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users visiting without HTTPS could be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows scripts and resources from anywhere, increasing risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site can be embedded in iframes on other sites, leading to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header risks executing files with a different type, which may lead to malicious scripts being run.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://cuelectric.net/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cuelectric.net/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cuelectric.net/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cuelectric.net/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cuelectric.net/employment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cuelectric.net/schedule/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 6 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://cuelectric.net/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://cuelectric.net/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://cuelectric.net/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://cuelectric.net/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://cuelectric.net/employment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://cuelectric.net/schedule/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://cuelectric.net/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/employment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/schedule/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://cuelectric.net/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/employment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cuelectric.net/schedule/ → no x-content-type-options
8 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 6 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    3 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near cuelectric.net

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling cuelectric.net from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own cuelectric.net?