Scanned sites / cooneylawspokane.com / 2026-09-13-0852

cooneylawspokane.com scan from 2026-09-13 08:52:13 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0852

Scanned 2026-09-13 08:52:13 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 11:49:07 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://cooneylawspokane.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

67/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 626 pages and 420 assets of cooneylawspokane.com, starting from https://cooneylawspokane.com/. It scored 67 out of 100, a result that needs work. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (543), heavy assets (42), title tags (304); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.4), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
626
Assets fetched
420
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,046 of 1,051 discovered URLs were fetched, 5 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 122 left unchecked.

  • Title tags304 issues
    304 of 545 pages have title issues. 45 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.2 points
  • Meta descriptions543 issues
    543 of 545 pages have meta description issues. 45 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.4 points
  • Headings483 issues
    483 of 545 pages have heading issues. 45 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.9 points
  • Broken links10 issues
    592 internal links point at 10 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites143 issues
    143 destinations answered with an error, 66 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 122 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects26 issues
    27 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses10 issues
    38 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 36 of them are pages, 10 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability196 issues
    196 of 575 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 15 pages noindex by design.
    −3.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 8787 image references have no alt attribute. 8774 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets42 issues
    42 assets larger than 500 KB among 420 fetched assets. 2 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages14 issues
    14 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage114 issues
    10 sitemaps listing 445 URLs: 100 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 14 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.2 points
  • Internal link counts274 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 274 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 545 pages have fewer than 200 words. 45 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content10 issues
    2 groups of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format28 noted
    28 of 626 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals211 noted
    211 of 590 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives590 noted
    590 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text606 noted
    606 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure20 noted
    20 of 545 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 45 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length45 noted
    45 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 590 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1046 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 590 pages; 527 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights4 noted
    Mobile performance 74 on average across 5 pages; 4 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2458 sites, median 80%, average 78%

cooneylawspokane.com scores 67%, higher than 12% of the 2458 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 72 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 72 sites74%: 71 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 98 sites78%: 111 sites79%: 95 sites80%: 117 sites81%: 110 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 111 sites84%: 113 sites85%: 93 sites86%: 73 sites87%: 79 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 69 sites90%: 43 sites91%: 51 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 26 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites67% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has notable issues that require attention. Focus on fixing broken links, non-200 responses, title tag, and meta description issues for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 592 internal links are broken, harming user experience and SEO.

    How: Update links to point to valid URLs or remove them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 38 URLs return errors, disrupting accessibility and crawling.

    How: Investigate and correct these URLs to return 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 303 title tags have issues, impacting search visibility.

    How: Modify titles to be concise (<60 characters) and relevant.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 542 meta descriptions are problematic, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Revise to be unique and include relevant keywords (~155 characters).

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Improve Headings Structure

    Why: 483 pages have heading issues, which can confuse search engines.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 and proper H2s.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Duplicate Content

    Why: 2 groups of duplicate pages can dilute page authority.

    How: Merge or differentiate content to avoid duplication.

    Checks: duplicate-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security assessment of your site revealed significant issues regarding HTTP security. Key mitigations like HTTP Strict Transport Security are absent, which increases vulnerability to interception. Additionally, protections against clickjacking and MIME sniffing are not implemented, potentially exposing users and sensitive data. Immediate attention is needed to improve your site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted when accessing your site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to all pages.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows your pages to be framed by other sites, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN' to all pages.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing MIME Sniffing Protection (X-Content-Type-Options)Low

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files leading to potential script execution.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to all pages.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from other domains without integrity checks risks security if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies trusted domains, or use Subresource Integrity where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The presence of sensitive paths in robots.txt can guide potential attackers.

    Fix: Ensure proper access control for /wp-admin/ rather than relying solely on robots.txt for security.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/make-a-payment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/dui-criminal-defense/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/estate-planning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/probate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/case-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/jim-cooney/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/dallas-cooney/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/tamarae-leong/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    15 of 590 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/make-a-payment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/dui-criminal-defense/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/estate-planning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/probate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/case-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/jim-cooney/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/dallas-cooney/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/tamarae-leong/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/make-a-payment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/dui-criminal-defense/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/estate-planning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/practice-areas/probate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/case-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/jim-cooney/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/dallas-cooney/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cooneylawspokane.com/attorneys/tamarae-leong/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • img1.wsimg.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 590 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 15 of 590 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near cooneylawspokane.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling cooneylawspokane.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own cooneylawspokane.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming cooneylawspokane.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.