Scanned sites / collegepark.dental / 2026-09-12-1137

collegepark.dental scan from 2026-09-12 11:37:18 UTC DR 1

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-1137

Scanned 2026-09-12 11:37:18 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 12:54:38 UTC

Site: https://collegepark.dental/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 16 pages and 216 assets of collegepark.dental, starting from https://collegepark.dental/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (9), thin content (6), sitemap coverage (7); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), thin content (−4), sitemap coverage (−3.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
16
Assets fetched
216
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

232 of 236 discovered URLs were fetched, 4 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 6 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 12 pages have title issues.
    −2.5 points
  • Meta descriptions9 issues
    9 of 12 pages have meta description issues.
    −6 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 12 pages have heading issues.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites22 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 5 destinations checked.
  • Redirects4 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.3 points
  • Non-200 responses5 noted
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 12 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 55 image references have no alt attribute. 55 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 216 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage7 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 12 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 7 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.5 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 12 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content6 issues
    6 of 12 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 16 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 12 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives12 noted
    12 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure6 noted
    6 of 12 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length7 noted
    7 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 12 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 232 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 12 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights4 noted
    Mobile performance 92 on average across 5 pages; 4 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2863 sites, median 80%, average 79%

collegepark.dental scores 80%, higher than 48% of the 2863 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 121 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website's health score is good, but there are several SEO issues to address. Prioritizing these fixes will enhance your site’s visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tags

    Why: 3 pages have long title tags that may negatively affect search visibility.

    How: Shorten the title tags to under 60 characters for better alignment with SEO best practices.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Fix Meta Descriptions

    Why: 9 pages have meta descriptions issues, including missing or duplicates that hinder search clarity.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions under 160 characters for each page to improve click-through rates.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Add Headings

    Why: 1 page is missing an H1 tag, which is crucial for content structure.

    How: Add a descriptive H1 tag to the page for better SEO.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Remove Redirects

    Why: 5 URLs are redirecting, which can slow down site performance.

    How: Directly link users to the final URLs to eliminate unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  5. 5

    Improve Internal Linking

    Why: 7 orphan pages lack internal links, reducing their discoverability.

    How: Add internal links pointing to these pages from relevant content for better authority and usability.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Enhance Page Content

    Why: 6 pages have thin content with fewer than 200 words, affecting their search ranking.

    How: Expand the content on these pages to be more informative and valuable to users.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The scan of collegepark.dental revealed several important security shortcomings. Notably, there is no HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), Content Security Policy (CSP), or X-Frame-Options headers present. Additionally, the server is disclosing its version, which can pose security risks. Addressing these issues will help improve the security posture of the website.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on their first request if they mistakenly type the URL without https://.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to attacks that exploit script, style, and frame loading from untrusted sources.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header such as: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows your site to be loaded within a frame on malicious sites, increasing clickjacking risks.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'. Alternatively, use CSP frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Leaking the server version can help attackers find known vulnerabilities applicable to your configuration.

    Fix: Modify server settings to obscure version information or set: 'Server: your-custom-string'.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://collegepark.dental/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/patients/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/our-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/global-styles/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-thank-you/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/update-medical-history-thank-you/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-children-10-and-under-thank-you/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-children-10-and-under/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://collegepark.dental/update-medical-history/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 12 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://collegepark.dental/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/patients/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/our-staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/global-styles/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-thank-you/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/update-medical-history-thank-you/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-children-10-and-under-thank-you/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-children-10-and-under/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://collegepark.dental/update-medical-history/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://collegepark.dental/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/patients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/our-staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/global-styles/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-thank-you/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/update-medical-history-thank-you/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-children-10-and-under-thank-you/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients-children-10-and-under/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/new-patients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://collegepark.dental/update-medical-history/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Flywheel/5.1.0 (232 responses)
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 12 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 12 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near collegepark.dental

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling collegepark.dental from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own collegepark.dental?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming collegepark.dental. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.