Scanned sites / chromesalonspa.com

SEO report for chromesalonspa.com DR 6

The latest Site Spider scan of chromesalonspa.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/chromesalonspa-com/2026-09-12-2117.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 21:17:06 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 21:49:57 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://chromesalonspa.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 3 pages and 254 assets of chromesalonspa.com, starting from https://chromesalonspa.com/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 3 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (12), headings (2), meta descriptions (1); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), headings (−4), meta descriptions (−2.7). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
3
Assets fetched
254
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
3 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

257 of 257 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 21 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 2 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Meta descriptions1 issue
    1 of 2 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 2 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites22 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 16 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 20 destinations checked.
  • Redirects55 noted
    55 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses55 noted
    55 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 2 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 49 image references have no alt attribute. 42 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets12 issues
    12 assets larger than 500 KB among 254 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    2 sitemaps listing 2 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 3 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 3 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 3 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives3 noted
    3 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 2 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length9 noted
    9 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 3 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 257 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 3 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights2 noted
    Mobile performance 55 on average across 2 pages; 2 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2691 sites, median 80%, average 78%

chromesalonspa.com scores 87%, higher than 79% of the 2691 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0631250%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 77 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 77 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 122 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 124 sites81%: 120 sites82%: 122 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 125 sites85%: 102 sites86%: 90 sites87%: 91 sites88%: 76 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 51 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 23 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Fixing the identified issues will improve your site's SEO performance and user experience. Prioritize addressing the redirects, adding a meta description, fixing heading issues, and optimizing heavy assets.

  1. 1

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can negatively impact user experience and SEO ranking.

    How: Change all redirecting URLs to direct links in your site's configuration.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions help improve click-through rates from search engines.

    How: Edit the privacy policy page to include a concise meta description.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Implement H1 Headings

    Why: H1 headings enhance SEO by clearly defining page content.

    How: Add a unique H1 heading to both the homepage and privacy policy page.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down your site, affecting load times and SEO.

    How: Compress or reduce dimensions of images larger than 500 KB.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security concerns that need attention. The absence of security headers like HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and Clickjacking protection increases vulnerability to attacks. Additionally, mixed content issues could allow interception of data. Immediate action is recommended to secure your site.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 0 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted if they enter the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts from any origin, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without it, your site can be embedded in frames on other sites, leading to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Mixed Content IssuesMedium

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages can lead to content tampering.

    Fix: Change HTTP URLs to HTTPS where possible for all resources.

    Evidence: Mixed content

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://chromesalonspa.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/1267-2/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 3 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://chromesalonspa.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/1267-2/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://chromesalonspa.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/1267-2/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMixed contentMedium

    10 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP, 9 of them scripts or stylesheets that browsers block or that can be tampered with in transit.

    • https://chromesalonspa.com/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/playfairdisplaysc…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/playfairdisplay.c…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/ptsans.css?ver=17…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/privacy-policy/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/playfairdisplaysc…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/privacy-policy/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/playfairdisplay.c…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/privacy-policy/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/ptsans.css?ver=17…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/1267-2/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/playfairdisplaysc…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/1267-2/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/playfairdisplay.c…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/1267-2/ loads stylesheet http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/css/ptsans.css?ver=17…
    • https://chromesalonspa.com/1267-2/ loads image http://chromesalonspa.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ChromeSalon-05-04-2024-3097.jpg
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (3 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 3 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 3 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    6 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of chromesalonspa.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near chromesalonspa.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling chromesalonspa.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own chromesalonspa.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming chromesalonspa.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.