Scanned sites / charltonandhill.com

SEO report for charltonandhill.com DR 19

The latest Site Spider scan of charltonandhill.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/charltonandhill-com/2026-09-10-0727.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 07:27:48 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 13:22:43 UTC

Site: https://charltonandhill.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 228 pages and 636 assets of charltonandhill.com, starting from https://charltonandhill.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (36), title tags (90), meta descriptions (108); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.2), meta descriptions (−4.1). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
228
Assets fetched
636
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

864 of 864 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 19 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags90 issues
    90 of 153 pages have title issues. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • Meta descriptions108 issues
    108 of 153 pages have meta description issues. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.1 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 153 pages have heading issues. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links14 issues
    156 internal links point at 14 broken URLs.
    −1.3 points
  • Links to other sites785 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 18 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses14 issues
    17 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 15 of them are pages, 14 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 162 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text138 issues
    138 of 1516 image references have no alt attribute. 1203 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.5 points
  • Heavy assets36 issues
    36 assets larger than 500 KB among 636 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages21 issues
    21 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage21 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 153 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 21 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.6 points
  • Internal link counts90 noted
    Internal link counts for 213 pages; 90 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 153 pages have fewer than 200 words. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content14 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.5 points
  • URL format14 noted
    14 of 228 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals60 noted
    60 of 213 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives213 noted
    213 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text57 noted
    57 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure43 noted
    43 of 153 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length34 noted
    33 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 213 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 864 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 213 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2324 sites, median 79%, average 78%

charltonandhill.com scores 82%, higher than 60% of the 2324 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site's health is good, but there are issues that need fixing, particularly with broken links, redirects, and content optimization. Addressing these can greatly enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 156 internal links lead to 14 broken URLs, harming user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify broken links and update or remove them. Use 'Redirects' tool to manage any links to be redirected.

    Checks: broken-links, redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 17 URLs returned non-200 statuses, which can negatively impact site accessibility.

    How: Update or remove the non-200 URLs, ensuring all return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 90 pages have title issues, which can affect search visibility.

    How: Revise titles to be within 60 characters and ensure uniqueness per page.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 77 pages have meta description issues, which can lower click-through rates.

    How: Create clear, concise meta descriptions under 160 characters for each affected page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: 4 pages have heading issues that could confuse users and search engines.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and appropriate H2s.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: 21 orphan pages lose traffic potential since they lack internal links.

    How: Integrate internal links to these orphan pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website charltonandhill.com has several missing security headers that can expose users to risks, including script injection and clickjacking. Addressing these vulnerabilities should be prioritized to enhance the site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users are vulnerable to interception on initial HTTP requests.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Absence of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The lack of CSP allows scripts and styles from any source, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://example.com.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded and overlaid with malicious content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts based on their contents.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Using external scripts without SRI exposes the site to script manipulation risks.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity for scripts or adding a CSP that specifies trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://charltonandhill.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/newsletter/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/plumbing-faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/woods-homes-fundraiser/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/land-acknowledgement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/areas-served/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/offers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://charltonandhill.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 213 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://charltonandhill.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/newsletter/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/financing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/plumbing-faq/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/woods-homes-fundraiser/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/land-acknowledgement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/areas-served/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/offers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://charltonandhill.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://charltonandhill.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/newsletter/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/plumbing-faq/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/woods-homes-fundraiser/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/land-acknowledgement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/areas-served/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/offers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://charltonandhill.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/newsletter/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/financing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/plumbing-faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/woods-homes-fundraiser/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/land-acknowledgement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/about-us/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/areas-served/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/offers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://charltonandhill.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • plugin.contractorcommerce.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.bugherd.com (40 script tags)
    • elfsightcdn.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (38 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 213 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    40 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of charltonandhill.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near charltonandhill.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling charltonandhill.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own charltonandhill.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming charltonandhill.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.