Scanned sites / carscallen.com

SEO report for carscallen.com DR 13

The latest Site Spider scan of carscallen.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/carscallen-com/2026-09-10-1222.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 12:22:43 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 18:09:46 UTC

Site: https://carscallen.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 300 pages and 106 assets of carscallen.com, starting from https://carscallen.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (26), headings (251), title tags (146); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), headings (−5.7), title tags (−5.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
300
Assets fetched
106
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

406 of 406 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 186 left unchecked.

  • Title tags146 issues
    146 of 251 pages have title issues. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.6 points
  • Meta descriptions73 issues
    73 of 251 pages have meta description issues. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Headings251 issues
    251 of 251 pages have heading issues. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.7 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 283 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 186 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects39 issues
    37 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.
    −0.6 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    38 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 37 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 263 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1075 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets26 issues
    26 assets larger than 500 KB among 106 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage27 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 224 URLs: 27 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.6 points
  • Internal link counts39 noted
    Internal link counts for 263 pages; 39 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 251 pages have fewer than 200 words. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format71 noted
    71 of 300 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals12 noted
    12 of 263 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives263 noted
    263 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text142 noted
    142 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure194 noted
    194 of 251 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies8 noted
    8 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 263 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 406 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 263 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 86 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2318 sites, median 79%, average 78%

carscallen.com scores 79%, higher than 47% of the 2318 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several issues impacting SEO, such as broken links, redirects, and title/meta description problems. By addressing these points, you can improve both user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links prevent users from accessing content, harming UX.

    How: Update or remove the internal link to the broken URL: https://carscallen.com/our-team/dale-johns-k-c/

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: Redirect chains can slow down page loading and dilute link authority.

    How: Identify the final destination URLs and update them directly to avoid redirects from: https://carscallen.com/our-expertise/mergers-acquisitions-private-equity/

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages returning non-200 responses may hurt your site's SEO.

    How: Review and fix URLs that returned a status other than 200, such as https://carscallen.com/?p=176.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Effective title tags can enhance click-through rates from search results.

    How: Shorten titles to less than 60 characters; prioritize those like: https://carscallen.com/blog/alberta-beer/alberta-beer-the-growth-of-the-craft-beer-industry/.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Better meta descriptions can boost search visibility.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be concise and compelling, keeping them under 160 characters. Start with: https://carscallen.com/blog/alberta-beer/alberta-beer-the-growth-of-the-craft-beer-industry/

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Headings structure impacts readability and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1. For example, change the homepage to have a single H1 instead of multiple.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks critical security measures, primarily a Content Security Policy (CSP), which could expose it to vulnerabilities like cross-site scripting. Additionally, there are third-party scripts without integrity checks and sensitive paths in the robots.txt file that should be secured. Immediate action is recommended.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to XSS attacks as the browser can load scripts from any source.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://kit.fontawesome.com https://www.google.com;'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts Lack SRILow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity (SRI) increases the risk of content manipulation.

    Fix: Consider using a CSP to specify allowed script sources and implement the SRI for the external scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes the '/wp-admin/' path, which could assist malicious users in probing for vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Restrict access to this path with proper authentication and consider removing the entry from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 263 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://carscallen.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/our-expertise/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/our-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/how-were-different/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/community/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/payments/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/blog/recent-grassy-mountain-decision-affirms-the-rule-of-law/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/blog/grassy-mountain-coal-project-privative-clauses-and-vavilov/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://carscallen.com/blog/whistleblower-policy-considerations/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • kit.fontawesome.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 263 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 263 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 263 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 263 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    9 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of carscallen.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near carscallen.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling carscallen.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own carscallen.com?