Scanned sites / boiseatitsbestflowers.com / 2026-09-10-0033

boiseatitsbestflowers.com scan from 2026-09-10 00:33:13 UTC DR 17

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-0033

Scanned 2026-09-10 00:33:13 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 00:39:03 UTC

Site: https://boiseatitsbestflowers.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 64 pages and 375 assets of boiseatitsbestflowers.com, starting from https://boiseatitsbestflowers.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (47), heavy assets (5), sitemap coverage (25); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), heavy assets (−3), sitemap coverage (−2.4). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
64
Assets fetched
375
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

439 of 439 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 24 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags12 issues
    12 of 54 pages have title issues. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Meta descriptions47 issues
    47 of 54 pages have meta description issues. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6 points
  • Headings13 issues
    13 of 54 pages have heading issues. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 12 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 24 destinations checked.
    −1.2 points
  • Redirects2 noted
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses4 noted
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 55 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 8 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 270 image references have no alt attribute. 158 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets5 issues
    5 assets larger than 500 KB among 375 fetched assets.
    −3 points
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage25 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 54 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 25 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.4 points
  • Internal link counts9 noted
    Internal link counts for 63 pages; 9 worth a look.
  • Thin content17 issues
    17 of 54 pages have fewer than 200 words. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format35 noted
    35 of 64 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals9 noted
    9 of 63 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives63 noted
    63 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text12 noted
    12 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure28 noted
    28 of 54 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length29 noted
    29 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 63 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 439 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 63 pages; 48 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 54 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2315 sites, median 79%, average 78%

boiseatitsbestflowers.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2315 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 69 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several areas for improvement, especially issues with redirects, non-200 responses, and meta descriptions. Focus on high-impact fixes first.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 4 URLs are returning errors, affecting user experience.

    How: Update or remove the broken URLs and ensure they return a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Improve site performance and user experience by minimizing unnecessary redirects.

    How: Change all internal links to point directly to the final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 12 pages have title issues, impacting SEO rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Shorten the titles to under 60 characters while keeping keywords.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: 47 pages lack meta descriptions, reducing search engine appeal.

    How: Craft unique meta descriptions of 50-160 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Multiple H1 Tags

    Why: 13 pages have multiple H1s, which confuses search engines.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag that accurately represents the content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Internal Linking

    Why: 25 orphan pages lack internal links, reducing their visibility.

    How: Add links from other relevant pages to these orphaned pages to enhance user navigation.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that should be addressed. Most notably, it lacks HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) and protection against clickjacking. Additionally, MIME sniffing protection is missing and there are concerns about third-party scripts running without integrity checks.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted on their first request if they type the address without https://.

    Fix: Implement HSTS by adding the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors, pages can be framed by malicious sites, exposing users to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without the X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header, browsers may run files as scripts based on their content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from third-party domains without integrity checks can pose significant risks if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing SRI or a Content-Security-Policy that specifies trusted script domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/weddings/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/help-support/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/shop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/stripe-checkout-result-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/stripe-checkout-result/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/asp-products/single-class/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/asp-products/5-class-card/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    7 of 63 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/weddings/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/help-support/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/shop/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/stripe-checkout-result-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/stripe-checkout-result/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/asp-products/single-class/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/asp-products/5-class-card/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/weddings/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/help-support/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/shop/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/stripe-checkout-result-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/stripe-checkout-result/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/asp-products/single-class/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.boiseatitsbestflowers.com/asp-products/5-class-card/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • snapwidget.com (1 script tag)
    • maps.googleapis.com (3 script tags)
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 63 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 7 of 63 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    5 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near boiseatitsbestflowers.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling boiseatitsbestflowers.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own boiseatitsbestflowers.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming boiseatitsbestflowers.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.