Scanned sites / bigriverfp.com / 2026-09-26-2000

bigriverfp.com scan from 9/26/2026, 8:00:01 PM

Scan 2026-09-26-2000

Scanned 9/26/2026, 8:00:01 PM, finished 9/27/2026, 3:19:54 PM. Found on page 2 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://bigriverfp.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

64/ 100Needs work

On September 26, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2 pages and 2 assets of bigriverfp.com, starting from https://bigriverfp.com/. It scored 64 out of 100, a result that needs work. 4 of 15 checks found something to fix, led by broken links (14), non-200 responses (14), headings (1); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to broken links (−20), non-200 responses (−10), headings (−3). 2 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
2
Assets fetched
2
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
4 of 15
CoverageComplete crawl

4 of 90 discovered URLs were fetched, 86 failed. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 2 pages have title issues.
  • Meta descriptionsOK
    0 of 2 pages have meta description issues.
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 2 pages have heading issues.
    −3 points
  • Broken links14 issues
    23 internal links point at 14 broken URLs.
    −20 points
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses14 issues
    87 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 14 of them are pages, 14 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −10 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 2 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 34 image references have no alt attribute. 4 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 2 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://bigriverfp.com/sitemap.xml (301), https://bigriverfp.com/sitemap_index.xml (failed). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 2 pages.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1606 sites, median 80%, average 79%

bigriverfp.com scores 64%, higher than 8% of the 1606 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

049980%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 2 sites38%: 2 sites39%: 0 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 0 sites45%: 3 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 3 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 5 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 7 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 6 sites55%: 3 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 5 sites58%: 10 sites59%: 5 sites60%: 9 sites61%: 11 sites62%: 15 sites63%: 15 sites64%: 10 sites65%: 18 sites66%: 18 sites67%: 31 sites68%: 25 sites69%: 22 sites70%: 35 sites71%: 36 sites72%: 47 sites73%: 37 sites74%: 46 sites75%: 52 sites76%: 60 sites77%: 56 sites78%: 73 sites79%: 56 sites80%: 79 sites81%: 98 sites82%: 79 sites83%: 77 sites84%: 71 sites85%: 54 sites86%: 57 sites87%: 52 sites88%: 56 sites89%: 46 sites90%: 31 sites91%: 34 sites92%: 21 sites93%: 10 sites94%: 13 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 6 sites97%: 6 sites98%: 1 site99%: 2 sites100%: 53 sites64% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several critical issues that need urgent attention, particularly broken links and a missing sitemap. Address these issues for improved SEO health.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 23 internal links point to broken URLs, affecting user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify if broken URLs are needed; if not, remove the links. If they are, restore the pages or redirect them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: One page has multiple H1s, leading to confusion for search engines.

    How: Ensure only one H1 exists per page. Edit the page's HTML to consolidate H1s into one.

    Checks: headings

  3. 3

    Create a Sitemap

    Why: No sitemap found, limiting search engine indexing of your pages.

    How: Generate a sitemap and upload it to your root directory as sitemap.xml. Ensure it's accessible and list it in robots.txt.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  4. 4

    Review Redirects

    Why: There’s a redirect occurring for the sitemap URL, which may confuse search engines.

    How: Check the redirect from sitemap.xml to ensure it's correctly set up and leads to a valid sitemap.

    Checks: redirects

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The review of bigriverfp.com revealed several missing security headers that could leave the site vulnerable to attacks, including interception on first requests and clickjacking. Implementing the suggested headers will significantly enhance the website's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on their first request if they omit 'https://'.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and styles, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options Header for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without it, pages can be embedded in frames on other sites, allowing clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without it, browsers may run files as scripts based on content rather than type.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this policy exposes full page addresses, risking user privacy.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external sources can potentially be compromised, affecting site integrity.

    Fix: Implement a CSP that allows only trusted domains for scripts or use Subresource Integrity.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Not limiting features can increase risk from injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://bigriverfp.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bigriverfp.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 2 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://bigriverfp.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bigriverfp.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://bigriverfp.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bigriverfp.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://bigriverfp.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bigriverfp.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://bigriverfp.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bigriverfp.com/about/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://bigriverfp.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bigriverfp.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (2 script tags)
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near bigriverfp.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling bigriverfp.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own bigriverfp.com?

bigriverfp.com scan 2026-09-26-2000 | DIY SEO Hub