Scanned sites / bestsaskatoon.ca / 2026-09-14-0217

bestsaskatoon.ca scan from 2026-09-14 02:17:26 UTC DR 1

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0217

Scanned 2026-09-14 02:17:26 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 02:37:50 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://bestsaskatoon.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 170 pages and 270 assets of bestsaskatoon.ca, starting from https://bestsaskatoon.ca/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (155), heavy assets (16), links to other sites (12); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.5), heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−2.8). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
170
Assets fetched
270
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

440 of 441 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 585 link destinations on other sites were checked, 230 left unchecked.

  • Title tags37 issues
    37 of 155 pages have title issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Meta descriptions155 issues
    155 of 155 pages have meta description issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.5 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 155 pages have heading issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    240 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites12 issues
    12 destinations answered with an error, 35 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 230 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −2.8 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 155 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 11 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 3279 image references have no alt attribute. 68 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets16 issues
    16 assets larger than 500 KB among 270 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage15 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 140 URLs: 15 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.5 points
  • Internal link counts11 noted
    Internal link counts for 166 pages; 11 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 155 pages have fewer than 200 words. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 170 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 166 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives166 noted
    166 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text65 noted
    65 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure92 noted
    92 of 155 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 166 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 440 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 166 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 82 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2867 sites, median 80%, average 79%

bestsaskatoon.ca scores 81%, higher than 52% of the 2867 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 76 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has some broken links, redirect issues, and title/meta description errors. Prioritize fixing these for better user experience and SEO. Address the headings and heavy assets as well for improvement.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Improves user experience and site navigation.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to the broken pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Redirects

    Why: Reduces unnecessary redirects, enhancing load times.

    How: Use 301 redirects for pages that should permanently redirect to a new address.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Maintains site credibility and accessibility.

    How: Fix or remove pages returning 404 errors.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Enhances search engine visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Ensure all title tags are under 60 characters and relevant.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Boosts search engine rankings and user engagement.

    How: Draft unique meta descriptions for all pages, ideally 70 characters long.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Correct Heading Issues

    Why: Improves content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 tag and relevant H2 tags where needed.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks a Content Security Policy, which can expose it to cross-site scripting attacks. Additionally, the robots.txt file discloses potentially sensitive paths. Implementing fixes for these issues is important to enhance the site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 0 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to various attacks like cross-site scripting.

    Fix: Add the header 'Content-Security-Policy' with appropriate rules, e.g., 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Potentially Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file discloses a path to /wp-admin/, which may lead to targeted attempts to access admin resources.

    Fix: Consider restricting access to sensitive paths with proper authentication and review the contents of the robots.txt file.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 166 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/automotive/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/business-support-supplies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/computer-and-electronics/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/construction-and-contractors/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/education/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/entertainment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/food-and-dining/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/health-and-medicine/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/home-and-garden/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/personal-care-and-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://bestsaskatoon.ca/legal-and-financial/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
11 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 166 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 166 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 166 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 166 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    200 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    Scripts from 1 other domain all carry Subresource Integrity hashes.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near bestsaskatoon.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling bestsaskatoon.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own bestsaskatoon.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming bestsaskatoon.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.