Scanned sites / backandneckclinics.com / 2026-09-10-0203

backandneckclinics.com scan from 2026-09-10 02:03:57 UTC DR 0

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for backandneckclinics.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-0203

Scanned 2026-09-10 02:03:57 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 02:29:32 UTC

Site: https://backandneckclinics.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 31 pages and 183 assets of backandneckclinics.com, starting from https://backandneckclinics.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (18), indexability (13), title tags (8); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.6), indexability (−4.2), title tags (−2.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
31
Assets fetched
183
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

214 of 215 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 11 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags8 issues
    8 of 18 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.6 points
  • Meta descriptions18 issues
    18 of 18 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.6 points
  • Headings9 issues
    9 of 18 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects2 noted
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses18 noted
    18 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability13 issues
    13 of 31 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −4.2 points
  • Image alt text4 issues
    4 of 123 image references have no alt attribute. 17 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.2 points
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 183 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    5 sitemaps listing 31 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.2 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 31 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 18 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 31 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals13 noted
    13 of 31 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives31 noted
    31 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure7 noted
    7 of 18 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length15 noted
    15 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 31 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 214 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 31 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2315 sites, median 79%, average 78%

backandneckclinics.com scores 84%, higher than 69% of the 2315 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues that require attention, particularly with title tags, meta descriptions, headings, and redirects. Following these priorities will improve your site’s performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 18 URLs return errors, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and resolve the URLs that return 404 or 301 errors; update or delete as necessary.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 7 title tags are too long, which can affect visibility in search results.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters for the affected URLs via your CMS.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: All meta descriptions are problematic, limiting click-through rates.

    How: Update all meta descriptions, aiming for 50-160 characters, on all affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing H1 Headings

    Why: Missing H1 headings affect content hierarchy and SEO ranking.

    How: Add appropriate H1 headings to the pages that currently lack them.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 2 URLs have unnecessary redirects, which can slow down navigation.

    How: Update the links to directly point to the final destination instead of redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  6. 6

    Improve Image Alt Text

    Why: 4 images lack alt text, which affects accessibility and SEO.

    How: Add descriptive alt text for all missing alt attributes on relevant images.

    Checks: images-alt

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks several important security headers and uses a vulnerable JavaScript library. This exposes it to various security risks, including clickjacking and potential script execution vulnerabilities. Implementing the recommended fixes will enhance protection significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to various attacks like XSS, allowing unauthorized scripts to load.

    Fix: Add the header `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded in an iframe, making it susceptible to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Frame-Options: DENY` to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: The site uses jQuery 1.12.4, which has vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on its usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This header prevents browsers from interpreting files as something other than declared, reducing the risk of certain types of attacks.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 31 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://backandneckclinics.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/brock-barnick-dc-ccsp/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-gregory-p-hoell-dc/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-erik-morrell-dc/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-john-marsh-dc/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/virtual-office-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/category/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/new-patients/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/your-first-visit/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://backandneckclinics.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/brock-barnick-dc-ccsp/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-gregory-p-hoell-dc/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-erik-morrell-dc/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-john-marsh-dc/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/virtual-office-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/category/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/new-patients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/your-first-visit/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://backandneckclinics.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/brock-barnick-dc-ccsp/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-gregory-p-hoell-dc/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-erik-morrell-dc/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-john-marsh-dc/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/virtual-office-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/category/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/new-patients/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backandneckclinics.com/your-first-visit/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.4. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.12.4 in https://backandneckclinics.com/wp-content/plugins/dmm-consent-guard/assets/lib/…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (31 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 31 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 31 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    35 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near backandneckclinics.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling backandneckclinics.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own backandneckclinics.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming backandneckclinics.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.