Scanned sites / backandneckclinics.com / 2026-09-10-0203
backandneckclinics.com scan from 2026-09-10 02:03:57 UTC DR 0
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for backandneckclinics.com.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-09-10-0203
Scanned 2026-09-10 02:03:57 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 02:29:32 UTC
Site: https://backandneckclinics.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 31 pages and 183 assets of backandneckclinics.com, starting from https://backandneckclinics.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (18), indexability (13), title tags (8); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.6), indexability (−4.2), title tags (−2.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 31
- Assets fetched
- 183
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 9 of 26
214 of 215 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 11 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags8 issues8 of 18 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−2.6 points
- Meta descriptions18 issues18 of 18 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4.6 points
- Headings9 issues9 of 18 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−1.7 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites2 issues2 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.−0.8 points
- Redirects2 noted2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses18 noted18 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability13 issues13 of 31 indexable pages have indexability warnings.−4.2 points
- Image alt text4 issues4 of 123 image references have no alt attribute. 17 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.−0.2 points
- Heavy assets3 issues3 assets larger than 500 KB among 183 fetched assets.−1.8 points
- Orphan pages1 issue1 page have no internal links pointing at them.−0.1 points
- Sitemap coverage1 issue5 sitemaps listing 31 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.−0.2 points
- Internal link countsOKInternal link counts for 31 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
- Thin contentOK0 of 18 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format1 noted1 of 31 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals13 noted13 of 31 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives31 noted31 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text1 noted1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure7 noted7 of 18 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length15 noted15 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 31 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 214 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 31 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2315 sites, median 79%, average 78%
backandneckclinics.com scores 84%, higher than 69% of the 2315 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
Your site has several SEO issues that require attention, particularly with title tags, meta descriptions, headings, and redirects. Following these priorities will improve your site’s performance.
- 1
Fix Non-200 Responses
Why: 18 URLs return errors, impacting user experience and SEO.
How: Identify and resolve the URLs that return 404 or 301 errors; update or delete as necessary.
Checks: status-codes
- 2
Optimize Title Tags
Why: 7 title tags are too long, which can affect visibility in search results.
How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters for the affected URLs via your CMS.
Checks: titles
- 3
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: All meta descriptions are problematic, limiting click-through rates.
How: Update all meta descriptions, aiming for 50-160 characters, on all affected pages.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 4
Add Missing H1 Headings
Why: Missing H1 headings affect content hierarchy and SEO ranking.
How: Add appropriate H1 headings to the pages that currently lack them.
Checks: headings
- 5
Fix Redirects
Why: 2 URLs have unnecessary redirects, which can slow down navigation.
How: Update the links to directly point to the final destination instead of redirecting.
Checks: redirects
- 6
Improve Image Alt Text
Why: 4 images lack alt text, which affects accessibility and SEO.
How: Add descriptive alt text for all missing alt attributes on relevant images.
Checks: images-alt
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website lacks several important security headers and uses a vulnerable JavaScript library. This exposes it to various security risks, including clickjacking and potential script execution vulnerabilities. Implementing the recommended fixes will enhance protection significantly.
- 0 high
- 3 medium
- 1 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to various attacks like XSS, allowing unauthorized scripts to load.
Fix: Add the header `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to all HTML pages.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 2
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded in an iframe, making it susceptible to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header `X-Frame-Options: DENY` to all HTML pages.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium
Why it matters: The site uses jQuery 1.12.4, which has vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on its usage.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 4
Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow
Why it matters: This header prevents browsers from interpreting files as something other than declared, reducing the risk of certain types of attacks.
Fix: Add the header `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` to all HTML pages.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
What the checks found
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 31 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://backandneckclinics.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/brock-barnick-dc-ccsp/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-gregory-p-hoell-dc/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-erik-morrell-dc/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-john-marsh-dc/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/virtual-office-tour/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/category/blog/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/new-patients/ → no content-security-policy
- https://backandneckclinics.com/your-first-visit/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://backandneckclinics.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/brock-barnick-dc-ccsp/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-gregory-p-hoell-dc/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-erik-morrell-dc/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-john-marsh-dc/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/virtual-office-tour/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/category/blog/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/new-patients/ → no x-frame-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/your-first-visit/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://backandneckclinics.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/brock-barnick-dc-ccsp/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-gregory-p-hoell-dc/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-erik-morrell-dc/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/dr-john-marsh-dc/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/virtual-office-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/category/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/new-patients/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://backandneckclinics.com/your-first-visit/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.4. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 1.12.4 in https://backandneckclinics.com/wp-content/plugins/dmm-consent-guard/assets/lib/…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (31 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 31 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 31 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
35 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near backandneckclinics.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- familyplumbing.caDR 1484/100 · rank 612 · 149 pages
- sundropwellnessclinic.comDR 184/100 · rank 612 · 32 pages
- lethbridgechamber.comDR 4884/100 · rank 612 · 16 pages
- lethbridgephysiotherapy.comDR 284/100 · rank 612 · 26 pages
- bozemancommunityauto.comDR 284/100 · rank 612 · 8 pages
- yourboisechiropractor.comDR 484/100 · rank 612 · 175 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling backandneckclinics.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own backandneckclinics.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming backandneckclinics.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.