Scanned sites / avenuesalons.com / 2026-09-13-0032

avenuesalons.com scan from 2026-09-13 00:32:18 UTC DR 2

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0032

Scanned 2026-09-13 00:32:18 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 00:49:09 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://avenuesalons.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

73/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 145 pages and 568 assets of avenuesalons.com, starting from https://avenuesalons.com/. It scored 73 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (131), heavy assets (9), headings (88); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.7), heavy assets (−5.4), headings (−3.9). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
145
Assets fetched
568
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

713 of 970 discovered URLs were fetched, 257 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 17 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags50 issues
    50 of 131 pages have title issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.7 points
  • Meta descriptions131 issues
    131 of 131 pages have meta description issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.7 points
  • Headings88 issues
    88 of 131 pages have heading issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.9 points
  • Broken links4 issues
    274 internal links point at 4 broken URLs.
    −0.6 points
  • Links to other sites292 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 13 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 15 destinations checked.
  • Redirects4 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses4 issues
    10 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 9 of them are pages, 4 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability40 issues
    40 of 131 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 5 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −2.9 points
  • Image alt text5 issues
    5 of 910 image references have no alt attribute. 302 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets9 issues
    9 assets larger than 500 KB among 568 fetched assets.
    −5.4 points
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage18 issues
    8 sitemaps listing 129 URLs: 5 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 10 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts10 noted
    Internal link counts for 136 pages; 10 worth a look.
  • Thin content31 issues
    31 of 131 pages have fewer than 200 words. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.8 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 145 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals41 noted
    41 of 136 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives136 noted
    136 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text256 noted
    256 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure49 noted
    49 of 131 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length27 noted
    27 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 136 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 713 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 136 pages; 122 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 59 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2348 sites, median 79%, average 78%

avenuesalons.com scores 73%, higher than 26% of the 2348 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 102 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites73% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has significant SEO issues, including broken links, missing meta descriptions, and poor indexability. Addressing these will enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 274 broken internal links can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update or remove broken URLs from the site.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 10 URLs do not return a 2xx response, affecting indexability.

    How: Check the status of these URLs and correct or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 50 pages have title issues, limiting SEO effectiveness.

    How: Create unique and descriptive titles for affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: All pages lack meta descriptions, lowering click-through rates.

    How: Write compelling meta descriptions for all pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Indexability Issues

    Why: 38 pages have indexability warnings that can prevent them from ranking.

    How: Add canonical tags where necessary to clarify indexing.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: 88 pages have heading issues, impacting content structure.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and appropriate headings.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security headers missing, which could expose users to risks such as man-in-the-middle attacks, clickjacking, and improper MIME type handling. Addressing these vulnerabilities is crucial to enhance the security posture of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows interception of user requests when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of X-Frame-Options permits embedding the site in frames, potentially leading to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers may misinterpret files, leading to potential security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Using scripts from external domains without SRI can lead to untrusted code execution if any of them are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity or a Content-Security-Policy that restricts these sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The presence of /wp-admin/ in robots.txt may expose sensitive areas to probing, despite its intended restriction.

    Fix: Consider implementing proper access control measures rather than relying solely on robots.txt for sensitive paths.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://avenuesalons.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/cart/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/book-online/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/festival/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/whyte-avenue/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/my-account/orders/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/my-account/edit-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/my-account/lost-password/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://avenuesalons.com/sherwood-park/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    4 of 136 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://avenuesalons.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/cart/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/book-online/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/festival/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/whyte-avenue/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/sherwood-park/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/hello-world/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/sample-page/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/book-online-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/product/gift-card/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://avenuesalons.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/cart/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/book-online/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/festival/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/whyte-avenue/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/my-account/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/my-account/orders/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/my-account/edit-account/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/my-account/lost-password/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://avenuesalons.com/sherwood-park/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • c0.wp.com (1283 script tags)
    • stats.wp.com (80 script tags)
    • unpkg.com (40 script tags)
    • js.stripe.com (26 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 136 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 4 of 136 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    76 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near avenuesalons.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling avenuesalons.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own avenuesalons.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming avenuesalons.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.