Scanned sites / aspireoptical.com / 2026-11-03-1332

aspireoptical.com scan from 2026-11-03 13:32:23 UTC DR 3

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-03-1332

Scanned 2026-11-03 13:32:23 UTC, finished 2026-11-03 13:38:23 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://aspireoptical.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On November 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2 pages and 40 assets of aspireoptical.com, starting from https://aspireoptical.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 3 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (1), sitemap coverage (1), links to other sites (1); 25 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), sitemap coverage (−6), links to other sites (−0.4). 5 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
2
Assets fetched
40
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
3 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

42 of 42 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 46 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 1 page have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptionsOK
    0 of 1 page have meta description issues.
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 1 page have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 46 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 1 indexable page have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 69 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 40 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    3 sitemaps listing 2 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 1 page; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 1 page have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 2 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 1 page have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1 noted
    1 page carries a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 1 page could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 1 page keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    1 of 1 indexable page carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (1), ListItem (1), WebSite (1), Organization (1), WebPage (1). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 1 page with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 1 page answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsOK
    0 of 0 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 42 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1 page; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling5 noted
    5 words an English dictionary does not know, on 1 page. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2782 sites, median 80%, average 79%

aspireoptical.com scores 84%, higher than 66% of the 2782 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0651300%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 42 sites67%: 41 sites68%: 39 sites69%: 51 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 78 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 79 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 125 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 125 sites81%: 122 sites82%: 130 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 104 sites86%: 93 sites87%: 92 sites88%: 78 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 42 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 24 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 119 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

There are a few issues to address to improve site SEO performance, including a redirect, a broken link, and title tag optimization. Prioritizing these fixes will enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Sitemap Redirect

    Why: The sitemap's URL returns a 301 redirect, preventing crawlers from accessing it.

    How: Update the sitemap URL directly to https://aspireoptical.com/ without a redirect.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  2. 2

    Update Title Tag

    Why: The title tag is too long, which can negatively affect its display in search results.

    How: Shorten the title tag to under 60 characters while retaining key information about the page.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Check Redirects on Main Domain

    Why: The homepage redirects from www to non-www, which can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Setup a preferred domain version (www or non-www) and ensure consistent linking.

    Checks: redirects

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security concerns that need addressing. The main issue is the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security, which can leave users vulnerable to interception. Additionally, using outdated libraries poses security risks, and missing certain policies can expose user data. Address these issues to enhance site security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors who type the site address may be intercepted on the first request.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to your server responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Outdated JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.2.1 and Bootstrap 3.3.5 exposes your site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 and Bootstrap to at least version 3.4.1.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a Referrer-Policy, full page addresses are shared with other sites when users navigate away.

    Fix: Include the header 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade' in your server responses.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Integrity ChecksLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains can modify site behavior if compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity or add a Content-Security-Policy that specifies allowed sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    No Permissions Policy SetInfo

    Why it matters: Absence of a Permissions-Policy leaves browser features enabled that could be exploited by scripts.

    Fix: Add the header 'Permissions-Policy: granted-permissions' only for features you need.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://aspireoptical.com/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://aspireoptical.com/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://aspireoptical.com/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap 3.3.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.2.1 in https://aspireoptical.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquer…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • Bootstrap 3.3.5 in https://aspireoptical.com/wp-content/themes/aspire/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=7.1.4: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (2 script tags)
9 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1 crawled page were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 1 HTML page.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 1 HTML page.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near aspireoptical.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling aspireoptical.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own aspireoptical.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming aspireoptical.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.