Scanned sites / aspenelectricalcontracting.com / 2026-09-12-0722

aspenelectricalcontracting.com scan from 2026-09-12 07:22:50 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0722

Scanned 2026-09-12 07:22:50 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 07:53:03 UTC

Site: https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 10 pages and 86 assets of aspenelectricalcontracting.com, starting from https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (9), thin content (8), indexability (2); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.2), thin content (−6.4), indexability (−2). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
10
Assets fetched
86
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

96 of 97 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 2 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 9 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1 points
  • Meta descriptions9 issues
    9 of 9 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −7.2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 9 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 2 destinations checked.
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    0 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 9 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
    −2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1 image reference have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 86 fetched assets.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    7 sitemaps listing 9 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 10 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content8 issues
    8 of 9 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 10 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 10 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives10 noted
    10 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 9 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 10 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 8 response headers recorded across 96 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 10 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 65 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

aspenelectricalcontracting.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several key issues were found on your website, including missing title tags and meta descriptions, along with indexability warnings. These issues must be prioritized for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Add Missing H1 Tags

    Why: All pages should have a clear H1 tag for SEO and user experience.

    How: Edit your page templates to include a unique H1 tag that summarizes the page content.

    Checks: headings

  2. 2

    Create Meta Descriptions

    Why: Every page needs a compelling meta description for search engine visibility.

    How: Write and add unique meta descriptions for each page, ideally between 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Fix Title Tags

    Why: Ensure title tags are concise and under 60 characters for optimal display in search results.

    How: Shorten the title tag on the homepage and ensure all pages have unique titles under the character limit.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Address Indexability Warnings

    Why: Canonical tags can help prevent indexation issues on important pages.

    How: Add canonical tags to the author and category pages to indicate the preferred versions.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Reduce Large Assets

    Why: Large images can slow down page load times, affecting user experience and SEO.

    How: Compress or resize images to be under 500 KB where possible, particularly the large ones.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Improve Thin Content

    Why: Pages with minimal content can undermine search visibility and user engagement.

    How: Expand content on pages with fewer than 200 words to provide more value to visitors.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has multiple security headers missing, which puts it at risk of various attacks, including man-in-the-middle and clickjacking. Implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security, a Content Security Policy, and Clickjacking protection is essential for safeguarding your visitors and data.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: No HSTS header is sent, allowing interception on initial requests.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and content from potentially harmful sources.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' www.googletagmanager.com.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: No X-Frame-Options means your pages can be embedded in malicious sites.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might incorrectly interpret file types, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: External scripts lack SRI, making them vulnerable to exploitation if compromised.

    Fix: Consider adding Subresource Integrity attributes to external scripts; alternatively, restrict with CSP.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive paths listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes potentially sensitive paths, which could help attackers probe your site.

    Fix: Ensure sensitive areas have proper access controls instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/projects-portfolio/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/employment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/2023/05/05/hello-world/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/testimonial/testimonial-1/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/testimonial/testimonial-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/category/uncategorized/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/author/steve/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/2023/05/05/hello-world/?replytocom=1 → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 10 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/projects-portfolio/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/employment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/2023/05/05/hello-world/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/testimonial/testimonial-1/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/testimonial/testimonial-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/category/uncategorized/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/author/steve/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/2023/05/05/hello-world/?replytocom=1 → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/projects-portfolio/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/employment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/2023/05/05/hello-world/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/testimonial/testimonial-1/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/testimonial/testimonial-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/category/uncategorized/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/author/steve/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/2023/05/05/hello-world/?replytocom=1 → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/projects-portfolio/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/employment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/2023/05/05/hello-world/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/testimonial/testimonial-1/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/testimonial/testimonial-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/category/uncategorized/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/author/steve/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://aspenelectricalcontracting.com/2023/05/05/hello-world/?replytocom=1 → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (10 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 10 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near aspenelectricalcontracting.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling aspenelectricalcontracting.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own aspenelectricalcontracting.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming aspenelectricalcontracting.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.