Scanned sites / ams-co.com

SEO report for ams-co.com DR 5

The latest Site Spider scan of ams-co.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/ams--co-com/2026-09-12-2200.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 22:00:02 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 22:06:30 UTC. Found on page 1 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://ams-co.com/contact/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

61/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 9 pages and 15 assets of ams-co.com, starting from https://ams-co.com/contact/. It scored 61 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (5), meta descriptions (5), headings (5); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−10), meta descriptions (−8), headings (−6). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
9
Assets fetched
15
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

24 of 24 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 83 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 5 pages have title issues.
  • Meta descriptions5 issues
    5 of 5 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • Headings5 issues
    5 of 5 pages have heading issues.
    −6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 34 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 83 destinations checked.
    −1.2 points
  • Redirects4 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −3.2 points
  • Non-200 responses6 noted
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability5 issues
    5 of 5 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −10 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 7 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 15 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://ams-co.com/sitemap.xml (302). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3.6 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 5 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 5 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −4.8 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 9 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals5 noted
    5 of 5 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 5 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text5 noted
    5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 5 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 5 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 24 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 5 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights1 noted
    Mobile performance 98 on average across 5 pages; 1 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2867 sites, median 80%, average 79%

ams-co.com scores 61%, higher than 6% of the 2867 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 76 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites61% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several critical SEO issues that need immediate attention, including redirect problems and missing meta descriptions. Addressing these will significantly improve your site's health score.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 6 websites are redirecting, potentially causing user experience issues.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects; ensure final URLs are directly accessible.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 6 URLs do not return 2xx status codes, affecting accessibility.

    How: Check and fix the status of each listed URL to ensure they return 200 response.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Create Unique Meta Descriptions

    Why: 5 pages have issues with duplicate and lengthy meta descriptions.

    How: Craft unique meta descriptions under 160 characters for each page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Implement Headings Structure

    Why: 5 pages are missing H1, impacting SEO performance.

    How: Add H1 tags describing the main topic of each page.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Add Canonical Tags and Viewport Meta

    Why: Indexability warnings on all pages may affect search visibility.

    How: Add canonical tags and viewport meta tags to the header of each page.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Develop Sitemap

    Why: A sitemap helps search engines index your site effectively.

    How: Create a sitemap and place it at https://ams-co.com/sitemap.xml.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site ams-co.com lacks important security headers that protect against various vulnerabilities. Specifically, there's no Content Security Policy, no clickjacking protection, and no MIME sniffing protection on any of the HTML pages. Additionally, third-party scripts are used without Subresource Integrity, increasing the risk of compromised resources.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, unauthorized scripts and styles can be executed, leading to XSS attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy using the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No X-Frame-Options means your site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY; to prevent this issue.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows browsers to interpret files incorrectly, risking execution of unintended scripts.

    Fix: Set the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff; to enable protection.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from an external domain without integrity checks increases the risk of malicious code being loaded.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity attributes on external scripts or restrict them in a Content Security Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 5 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://ams-co.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://ams-co.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://ams-co.com/products/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://ams-co.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://ams-co.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://ams-co.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ams-co.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ams-co.com/products/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ams-co.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://ams-co.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://ams-co.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ams-co.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ams-co.com/products/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ams-co.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://ams-co.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • count.carrierzone.com (5 script tags)
8 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 5 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 5 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of ams-co.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near ams-co.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling ams-co.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own ams-co.com?