Scanned sites / almendrabaking.ca / 2026-11-02-1526

almendrabaking.ca scan from 2026-11-02 15:26:52 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-02-1526

Scanned 2026-11-02 15:26:52 UTC, finished 2026-11-02 15:56:18 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://almendrabaking.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On November 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4 pages and 131 assets of almendrabaking.ca, starting from https://almendrabaking.ca/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 4 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (2), sitemap coverage (2), headings (1); 24 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), sitemap coverage (−6), headings (−3). 5 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
4
Assets fetched
131
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
4 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

135 of 135 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags2 issues
    2 of 2 pages have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptionsOK
    0 of 2 pages have meta description issues.
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 2 pages have heading issues.
    −3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesOK
    0 destinations answered with an error, of 13 destinations checked.
  • Redirects3 noted
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses3 noted
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 2 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 30 image references have no alt attribute. 10 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 131 fetched assets.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 4 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 2 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 2 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 4 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 2 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2 noted
    2 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 2 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length4 noted
    3 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 2 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    2 of 2 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (2), ListItem (2), WebSite (2), Organization (2), WebPage (2). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 2 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsOK
    0 of 2 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 135 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling3 noted
    3 words an English dictionary does not know, on 2 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2620 sites, median 80%, average 78%

almendrabaking.ca scores 80%, higher than 50% of the 2620 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601200%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 5 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 5 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 15 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 39 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 74 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 78 sites74%: 76 sites75%: 84 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 106 sites78%: 118 sites79%: 106 sites80%: 120 sites81%: 115 sites82%: 119 sites83%: 117 sites84%: 120 sites85%: 98 sites86%: 87 sites87%: 86 sites88%: 70 sites89%: 72 sites90%: 48 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 41 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 16 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

There are several issues that need addressing, including redirects, title tags, missing headings, and large assets. Prioritizing these fixes can significantly improve your site's SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can dilute link equity and confuse search engines.

    How: Update your sitemap and remove redirects from the URLs: /elementor-hf/footer/ and /elementor-hf/header/.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improper title lengths can hinder visibility in search results.

    How: Rework the title for the page at https://almendrabaking.ca/menu/ to exceed 30 characters and consider shortening https://almendrabaking.ca's title to be under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Add Missing H1

    Why: H1 tags are crucial for SEO and user experience.

    How: Add an H1 tag to the page at https://almendrabaking.ca/. Ensure it's relevant to the page content.

    Evidence: One page: missing h1.

    1 page affected

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets slow down page load times, affecting user experience and SEO.

    How: Compress the large assets noted, especially images and scripts at /wp-content/plugins/elementor/ and other identified paths.

    Evidence: 70.5 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 2 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    2 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  5. 5

    Review Sitemap Coverage

    Why: A sitemap with broken URLs can impact indexing.

    How: Ensure your sitemap links to only valid URLs and update it accordingly to avoid including URLs with 301 redirects.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review for almendrabaking.ca identifies several vulnerabilities including the absence of critical response headers, which could expose the site to various attacks. Implementing the recommended security headers is essential to enhance protection against threats like clickjacking and data interception.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors using HTTP may be vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows scripts and resources from any source, increasing risks of XSS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header exposes the site to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files based on their content, not type.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff'.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive information may be leaked to other sites.

    Fix: Add the header 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer'.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Absence of this policy exposes unused browser features to potential abuse.

    Fix: Add the header 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), camera=()'.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://almendrabaking.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://almendrabaking.ca/menu/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 2 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://almendrabaking.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://almendrabaking.ca/menu/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://almendrabaking.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://almendrabaking.ca/menu/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://almendrabaking.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://almendrabaking.ca/menu/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://almendrabaking.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://almendrabaking.ca/menu/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://almendrabaking.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://almendrabaking.ca/menu/ → no permissions-policy
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near almendrabaking.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling almendrabaking.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own almendrabaking.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming almendrabaking.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.