Scanned sites / allwestvet.com

SEO report for allwestvet.com DR 9

The latest Site Spider scan of allwestvet.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/allwestvet-com/2026-09-13-2132.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 21:32:29 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 21:42:57 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://allwestvet.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 33 pages and 238 assets of allwestvet.com, starting from https://allwestvet.com/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (15), meta descriptions (11), heavy assets (4); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−4.8), meta descriptions (−2.8), heavy assets (−2.4). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
33
Assets fetched
238
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

271 of 271 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 16 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags15 issues
    15 of 31 pages have title issues.
    −4.8 points
  • Meta descriptions11 issues
    11 of 31 pages have meta description issues.
    −2.8 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 31 pages have heading issues.
    −0.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 16 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses5 noted
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 31 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 61 image references have no alt attribute. 2 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 238 fetched assets.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.9 points
  • Sitemap coverage9 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 29 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 7 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.7 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 31 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 31 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 33 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 31 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives31 noted
    31 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure6 noted
    6 of 31 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 31 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 271 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 31 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 54 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

allwestvet.com scores 86%, higher than 73% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has good health but needs attention on redirects, non-200 responses, title and meta description issues, missing headings, and sitemap coverage. Address these to improve SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Simplifies URL structure, enhancing user experience.

    How: Change redirects to direct URLs without 301 status. Update internal links accordingly.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Improves site accessibility and indexability.

    How: Check URLs returning errors, fix or remove them to ensure they return 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Enhances click-through rate from search results.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters, ensuring clarity and relevancy.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Increases search visibility and engagement.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be under 160 characters; add missing descriptions.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Improves content structure and SEO relevance.

    How: Insert H1 tags on pages without them for better content hierarchy.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensures all important pages are indexed by search engines.

    How: Update sitemap to include crawled but unlisted pages; link to orphan pages.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks a Content Security Policy, which could expose it to various security risks. Additionally, third-party scripts without integrity checks and potentially sensitive paths in your robots.txt require attention. These issues should be prioritized to enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting and data injection attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header. For example: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` This restricts content loading to your own domain.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be compromised, affecting your site’s security and integrity.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity (SRI) for internal scripts, or implement a Content Security Policy that specifies trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file lists a sensitive path which can be exploited by attackers to gain insights into your website's structure.

    Fix: Consider removing sensitive entries from the robots.txt or secure those paths with proper authentication.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 31 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://allwestvet.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/about-all-west-veterinary-hospital/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/veterinarian-bozeman-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/bozeman-mt-veterinary-jobs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/pet-wellness-exams-bozeman-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/pet-dental-care-bozeman-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/pet-spay-and-neuter-bozeman-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/pet-microchipping-bozeman-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/pet-in-house-diagnostics-bozeman-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/equine-care-bozeman-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allwestvet.com/exotic-care-bozeman-mt/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • birdeye.com (1 script tag)
    • us.vetstoria.com (31 script tags)
    • boards.greenhouse.io (32 script tags)
    • www.google.com (27 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 31 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 31 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 31 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 31 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    28 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of allwestvet.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near allwestvet.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling allwestvet.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own allwestvet.com?