Scanned sites / afjlawfirm.com

SEO report for afjlawfirm.com DR 7

The latest Site Spider scan of afjlawfirm.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/afjlawfirm-com/2026-11-03-1451.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-11-03 14:51:45 UTC, finished 2026-11-03 15:31:53 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://afjlawfirm.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

88/ 100Good

On November 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 133 pages and 155 assets of afjlawfirm.com, starting from https://afjlawfirm.com/. It scored 88 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (87), meta descriptions (54), sitemap coverage (15); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−7.3), meta descriptions (−3.6), sitemap coverage (−0.8). 12 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
133
Assets fetched
155
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

288 of 288 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 63 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags87 issues
    87 of 120 pages have title issues.
    −7.3 points
  • Meta descriptions54 issues
    54 of 120 pages have meta description issues.
    −3.6 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 120 pages have heading issues.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites535 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 44 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 63 destinations checked.
  • Redirects13 issues
    14 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses14 noted
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 120 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 242 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 155 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage15 issues
    8 sitemaps listing 112 URLs: 8 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 7 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts10 noted
    Internal link counts for 120 pages; 10 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 120 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 133 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 120 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives120 noted
    120 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text57 noted
    57 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure61 noted
    61 of 120 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation120 noted
    120 of 120 pages have HTML problems: 120 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    32 of 120 indexable pages carry structured data: Organization (17), FAQPage (14), Question (14), Answer (14), LegalService (11). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 120 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 120 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions24 noted
    24 of 113 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    66 pages in pagination sequences; 0 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 19 response headers recorded across 288 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 120 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling26 noted
    26 words an English dictionary does not know, on 51 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2839 sites, median 80%, average 79%

afjlawfirm.com scores 88%, higher than 80% of the 2839 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0721430%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 42 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 79 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 129 sites79%: 112 sites80%: 125 sites81%: 123 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 121 sites84%: 129 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 79 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 57 sites92%: 42 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 143 sites88% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your website has a solid health score, but there are key issues with titles, meta descriptions, orphan pages, and sitemap coverage that should be fixed for better visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Duplicate Title Tags

    Why: 87 pages have title issues, affecting SEO and user understanding.

    How: Assign unique titles to duplicate pages; ensure titles are concise and relevant.

    Evidence: 2 pages share the title "Common Pedestrian Injury Claims in Montana and How to File …", which usually means one template writes it for all of them.

    2 pages affected

    Depends on: If these pages really are the same content, the duplicate title is a symptom: canonicalise them to one URL instead.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 54 pages lack meta descriptions, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Write engaging descriptions for all pages without them, making them clear and relevant.

    Evidence: 43 pages have no meta description at all.

    43 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: 7 orphan pages have no internal links, reducing SEO value.

    How: Create internal links to these pages to improve their visibility and indexing.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  4. 4

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 8 URLs missing from the sitemap can hinder indexing.

    How: Add these URLs to your sitemap for better coverage.

    Evidence: 8 URLs: not in sitemap.

    8 pages affected

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  5. 5

    Consolidate H1 Tags

    Why: One page has multiple H1s, which confuses search engines.

    How: Remove duplicate H1s, ensuring only one remains for clarity.

    Evidence: One page: multiple h1s.

    1 page affected

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review for afjlawfirm.com reveals several issues that could expose the site to attacks. Key findings include disclosing server versions and a Google API key in the public source code, which could be leveraged by malicious actors. Additionally, the Content Security Policy allows unsafe scripts, weakening protection against XSS attacks. Immediate remediation is recommended.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A publicly accessible API key can be used maliciously if not properly restricted.

    Fix: Restrict the key by referrer in Google Cloud Console to ensure it can only be used from your domains.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  2. 2

    Insecure Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Allowing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' reduces the effectiveness of CSP against XSS attacks.

    Fix: Update the Content Security Policy to remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' from the `script-src` directive.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Software Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The server version information can help attackers find known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide the server version by configuring your web server to not disclose the version details. For Apache, use: 'ServerTokens Prod'; and for Nginx, add: 'server_tokens off;'.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The listed paths could give attackers insight into the site's structure and sensitive areas.

    Fix: Restrict sensitive areas like /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php using proper authentication instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache/2.4.69 (Debian) (200 responses)
    • server: nginx (87 responses)
    • server: CloudFront (1 response)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…Yk (39 chars) in https://afjlawfirm.com/contact-us/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://afjlawfirm.com/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/bicycle-accidents-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/car-accidents-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/catastrophic-injuries-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/commercial-trucking-semi-truck-accidents-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/dog-bite-injuries-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/insurance-coverage-disputes-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/motorcycle-accidents-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/pedestrian-accidents-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/products-liability-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://afjlawfirm.com/practice-areas/medical-malpractice-attorney-bozeman-mt/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
10 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 120 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 120 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 120 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 120 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 120 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 120 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of afjlawfirm.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near afjlawfirm.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling afjlawfirm.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own afjlawfirm.com?